MAKING THE PICTURES BIG: GodSpy interviews Barbara Nicolosi: "...When you've been thrown out of the convent during the worst vocation crisis in the history of the Church, what else can the world do to you?
"...If we turned over Hollywood to the Christians tomorrow, we'd make worse movies than we're making now because they would mostly be guilty of what Flannery O'Connor called--for Christian--'inexcusable sentimentality.'
"...One of the reasons Barbara Hall became a Catholic, as she expressed it to me, was: 'I just got exhausted with unbelief. I just couldn't keep it up anymore.' She's typical of the creative community that has worn itself out since the sexual revolution, throwing itself around, doing anything it wanted, absolute license and power. And they're exhausted. So, they come to faith with a deep understanding of sin.
"...First, in terms of artistry, I think the Catholics, even the ones who are lapsed, have a natural sense of allegory and metaphor that comes from several thousand years of ingrained liturgy. The liturgy is real, but it's also rich in symbols. So you have the people who are fallen away--I'm thinking of a screenwriter right now who's an angry, angry ex-Catholic. He's done so much harm. But he has an instinctive sense of symbolism that gives his writing visual power. I've said to him several times, 'the reason you're really good is because you were Catholic' and when we're alone he'll acknowledge it. I think the liturgical tradition is key to that.
"...I think that, unfortunately, a lot of orthodox Catholics and Christians are either sitting in the cave hunkered down, or they're like Jonah sitting under a Gourd plant waiting for God to vent his wrath on the world--on the ungodly--and they're going to be disappointed if He doesn't. I don't see these people having sorrow for sin; I see them having indignation towards sin. And to me, that's an important difference. Sorrow for sin is 'I am a part of this.' Indignation for sin is 'you are the ones messing up the world.'"
more
Sunday, December 21, 2003
I know a girl from a lonely street,
Cold as blogwatch, but still as sweet...
About Last Night: Terry Teachout quotes the best passage from CS Lewis's best work: "All reality is iconoclastic. The earthly beloved, even in this life, incessantly triumphs over your mere idea of her. And you want her to; you want her with all her resistances, all her faults, all her unexpectedness. That is, in her foursquare and independent reality. And this, not any image or memory, is what we are to love still, after she is dead."
Hit and Run: Libya disarms. Dominos going click-click-click?
Marriage Movement: "Home is the place where you begin when you ask 'Who am I?' 'Where did I come from?' Having two homes oriented around two separate poles of mom and dad means the child travels between two wholly differentiated spheres of moral and spiritual meaning. The parents do not communicate or seek accord on these core issues anymore, but the child still looks to both of them at the first and most important role models for how to think and what to believe. The child must seek, alone, to make sense of all the differences that he or she observes in the parents and develop his or own identity and value system much more independently than children of intact families -- who live in one home -- must do."
Oxblog: Law books to Iraq.
NYTimes: Bush was right on Libya.
And if I said this, you'd all hate me: "Homosexuals can always tell tinsel from gold, they just prefer the tinsel." Do I get away with it by saying I think there's something intensely attractive and human there?
Cold as blogwatch, but still as sweet...
About Last Night: Terry Teachout quotes the best passage from CS Lewis's best work: "All reality is iconoclastic. The earthly beloved, even in this life, incessantly triumphs over your mere idea of her. And you want her to; you want her with all her resistances, all her faults, all her unexpectedness. That is, in her foursquare and independent reality. And this, not any image or memory, is what we are to love still, after she is dead."
Hit and Run: Libya disarms. Dominos going click-click-click?
Marriage Movement: "Home is the place where you begin when you ask 'Who am I?' 'Where did I come from?' Having two homes oriented around two separate poles of mom and dad means the child travels between two wholly differentiated spheres of moral and spiritual meaning. The parents do not communicate or seek accord on these core issues anymore, but the child still looks to both of them at the first and most important role models for how to think and what to believe. The child must seek, alone, to make sense of all the differences that he or she observes in the parents and develop his or own identity and value system much more independently than children of intact families -- who live in one home -- must do."
Oxblog: Law books to Iraq.
NYTimes: Bush was right on Libya.
And if I said this, you'd all hate me: "Homosexuals can always tell tinsel from gold, they just prefer the tinsel." Do I get away with it by saying I think there's something intensely attractive and human there?
Thursday, December 18, 2003
If I had a gun
For every blog that I have watched
I could arm a town the size of Abilene...
Church of the Masses: Why artists can't accept aesthetic relativism--a dialogue:
"Writer Friend: ...I could go on about what's wrong with anything... but what's the point?
"Barb N: Because we want to be great artists."
Thought Balloons: These are really pretty covers. Like broken-up Soviet realism. Og like. (Yeah, that really shored up my anti-aesthetic-relativism stance....)
A Volokh Conspirator on France's hostile secularism. Relapsed Catholic points out that headscarves are often worn because women fear they'll be attacked without them; I like how thoroughly the French government is avoiding addressing that problem.
Bishop Accountability. Tracks news, court documents, etc. related to Catholic clergy abuse. If you check out this site I strongly recommend you also take a look at Amy Welborn's site (which is where I got the link), since she reminds us that while these sites are absolutely necessary, they're necessary as a way of cleansing the Church and returning us to focus on Christ.
For every blog that I have watched
I could arm a town the size of Abilene...
Church of the Masses: Why artists can't accept aesthetic relativism--a dialogue:
"Writer Friend: ...I could go on about what's wrong with anything... but what's the point?
"Barb N: Because we want to be great artists."
Thought Balloons: These are really pretty covers. Like broken-up Soviet realism. Og like. (Yeah, that really shored up my anti-aesthetic-relativism stance....)
A Volokh Conspirator on France's hostile secularism. Relapsed Catholic points out that headscarves are often worn because women fear they'll be attacked without them; I like how thoroughly the French government is avoiding addressing that problem.
Bishop Accountability. Tracks news, court documents, etc. related to Catholic clergy abuse. If you check out this site I strongly recommend you also take a look at Amy Welborn's site (which is where I got the link), since she reminds us that while these sites are absolutely necessary, they're necessary as a way of cleansing the Church and returning us to focus on Christ.
Tuesday, December 16, 2003
IRAQNESS: Iranian blog reactions to Saddam's capture.
Healing Iraq: "I still haven't been able to get rid of this deep sadness that has overcome me the last two days. People have been emailing asking me to explain. I wish I could, but I simply can't.
"...If you had lived all your life ruled by a tough dictator elevated to the level of a god and then suddenly without warning watched that dictator displayed to the public on tv as a 'man', you probably would have related with my position.
"The images were shocking. I couldn't make myself believe this was the same Saddam that slaughtered hundreds of thousands and plundered my country's wealth for decades. The humiliation I experienced was not out of nationalistic pride or Islamic notions of superiority or anything like that as some readers suggested. It was out of a feeling of impotence and helplessness. This was just one old disturbed man yet the whole country couldn't dispose of him. We needed a superpower from the other side of the ocean to come here and 'get him' for us. I was really confused that day I went out and almost got myself killed by those Fedayeen and angry teenagers in the Adhamiya district.
"...He must be handed over to Iraqis. I don't care about legitimacy. He must be tried publicly in an Iraqi civil court by Iraqi judges. The rest of the Arab dictators should see it and learn from it.
"And I'm still wondering why? Why did he have to put himself into this? Why did he have to destroy Iraq? What did he gain from all of this?"
Enormous amount of stuff at Iraq the Model and you should read all of it. Including: "I met him in a photo copy office owned by a friend. My friend introduced him to me, his name is Firas Mahmood Ya'koob, a junior resident in Al-Karkh hospital for surgery in Baghdad, a shy young man, holding some photos of men, women, and children. He wanted to make copies of them so
I knew there was a story behind them. I couldn't help asking him about it, he said 'I'm from Al-Dujaile.'
"I understood what he meant.
In Saddam's time we used to whisper about Al-Dujaile, we all knew that a massacre happened there, but we didn't dare to ask about the details and I never met any one from there. Now I can know all about it from my new friend and here it is, in his own words..." more
Plus news bites. And this: "I asked one of the waiters about the secret behind this sudden improvement, he laughed and told me: Saddam's gone now, and our boss can expand his business without worrying about being kicked out of this place and losing every thing he spent on this coffee shop, Saddam and his relatives had enormous greed for any piece of land near the river." And more.
Where Is Raed is back on the air: "There was another moment when the GC members were describing their meeting with Saddam and told the journalists about the deriding remarks he made when they asked him about the Sadir's assasination and the mass graves, he sounded like he has totally lost it.
"I want a fully functioning Saddam who will sit on a chair in front of a TV camera for 10 hours everyday and tells us what exactly happened the last 30 years. I do not care about the fair trial thing Amnesty Int. is worried about and I don'r really care much about the fact that the Iraqi judges might not be fullt qualified, we all know he should rot in hell. but what I do care about is that he gets a public trial because I want to hear all the untold stories" more
Healing Iraq: "I still haven't been able to get rid of this deep sadness that has overcome me the last two days. People have been emailing asking me to explain. I wish I could, but I simply can't.
"...If you had lived all your life ruled by a tough dictator elevated to the level of a god and then suddenly without warning watched that dictator displayed to the public on tv as a 'man', you probably would have related with my position.
"The images were shocking. I couldn't make myself believe this was the same Saddam that slaughtered hundreds of thousands and plundered my country's wealth for decades. The humiliation I experienced was not out of nationalistic pride or Islamic notions of superiority or anything like that as some readers suggested. It was out of a feeling of impotence and helplessness. This was just one old disturbed man yet the whole country couldn't dispose of him. We needed a superpower from the other side of the ocean to come here and 'get him' for us. I was really confused that day I went out and almost got myself killed by those Fedayeen and angry teenagers in the Adhamiya district.
"...He must be handed over to Iraqis. I don't care about legitimacy. He must be tried publicly in an Iraqi civil court by Iraqi judges. The rest of the Arab dictators should see it and learn from it.
"And I'm still wondering why? Why did he have to put himself into this? Why did he have to destroy Iraq? What did he gain from all of this?"
Enormous amount of stuff at Iraq the Model and you should read all of it. Including: "I met him in a photo copy office owned by a friend. My friend introduced him to me, his name is Firas Mahmood Ya'koob, a junior resident in Al-Karkh hospital for surgery in Baghdad, a shy young man, holding some photos of men, women, and children. He wanted to make copies of them so
I knew there was a story behind them. I couldn't help asking him about it, he said 'I'm from Al-Dujaile.'
"I understood what he meant.
In Saddam's time we used to whisper about Al-Dujaile, we all knew that a massacre happened there, but we didn't dare to ask about the details and I never met any one from there. Now I can know all about it from my new friend and here it is, in his own words..." more
Plus news bites. And this: "I asked one of the waiters about the secret behind this sudden improvement, he laughed and told me: Saddam's gone now, and our boss can expand his business without worrying about being kicked out of this place and losing every thing he spent on this coffee shop, Saddam and his relatives had enormous greed for any piece of land near the river." And more.
Where Is Raed is back on the air: "There was another moment when the GC members were describing their meeting with Saddam and told the journalists about the deriding remarks he made when they asked him about the Sadir's assasination and the mass graves, he sounded like he has totally lost it.
"I want a fully functioning Saddam who will sit on a chair in front of a TV camera for 10 hours everyday and tells us what exactly happened the last 30 years. I do not care about the fair trial thing Amnesty Int. is worried about and I don'r really care much about the fact that the Iraqi judges might not be fullt qualified, we all know he should rot in hell. but what I do care about is that he gets a public trial because I want to hear all the untold stories" more
"DONNIE DARKO": Saw this movie on Friday with Tepper, an anarchocapitalist for marriage, and Mrs. Shamed. (Tepper: "So... we've got a conservative, an anarchocapitalist, and a radical federalist." What better group to see a movie about a giant apocalyptic rabbit?)
Anyway. I'm still not sure whether "DD" made any sense. Apparently this site OOPS! this site! offers some guidance. I will say that I am really, really, REALLY looking forward to seeing it again. It feels sprawling or sloppy in structure, but I'm pretty sure every moment was crafted to advance the point--whatever that point was! The main thing I'm still trying to figure out is what the $#@! was up with Jim Cunningham and his final fate, so if you have theories on what happened to him and how it plays into the main questions of the movie, send 'em along.
I described "DD" to Ratty as "a perfect late '80s/early '90s teen-rebellion flick--like 'Heathers' or 'Pump Up the Volume' only much better--crossed with a Christian or quasi-Christian apocalyptic movie."
Her response: "So basically this was the movie of your life, then?"
Yeah. I've gotta see this again.
Anyway. I'm still not sure whether "DD" made any sense. Apparently this site OOPS! this site! offers some guidance. I will say that I am really, really, REALLY looking forward to seeing it again. It feels sprawling or sloppy in structure, but I'm pretty sure every moment was crafted to advance the point--whatever that point was! The main thing I'm still trying to figure out is what the $#@! was up with Jim Cunningham and his final fate, so if you have theories on what happened to him and how it plays into the main questions of the movie, send 'em along.
I described "DD" to Ratty as "a perfect late '80s/early '90s teen-rebellion flick--like 'Heathers' or 'Pump Up the Volume' only much better--crossed with a Christian or quasi-Christian apocalyptic movie."
Her response: "So basically this was the movie of your life, then?"
Yeah. I've gotta see this again.
I have only come here seeking knowledge,
Things they would not teach me of in blogwatch...
[Are those really the lyrics? "Things they would not teach me of in college"??? I thought it was the much-less-stupid "things they would not teach me back in college." Points off, "Sting." ("Sting"?) ("Hannnnsel?"--prize to whoever gets that one.)]
After Abortion: More on post-abortion grief--don't try to go it alone; and more on post-abortion depression: "Sarah Stoesz of Planned Parenthood indicated in her letter to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune that '10 percent of women who have abortions experience depressive symptoms of a lingering nature.'
"I could have gone on to include her claim, as per her linked letter, that a similar percentage of women who give birth experience lingering depression.
"I also could have pointed out that both of her claims are unsupported by current research...." more
MarriageMovement: Besides the usual Marquardtly goodness, there's a series of sharp posts from Tom Sylvester on Strom Thurmond and his daughter: "He paid his daughter to deny her own father. For over 60 years. And it was his fault that she would have been poor in the first place." Public image, limited. And Thurmond as illegitimate father.
The Volokh Conspiracy: Randy Barnett on the Ninth Circuit decision, based on Commerce Clause, invalidating prohibition of medical marijuana. I don't pretend to understand the commerce clause; on first glance this looks like the right call, and certainly I'm happy about the policy outcome.
And it's a beautiful day/For an Otto-da-Fe.
Things they would not teach me of in blogwatch...
[Are those really the lyrics? "Things they would not teach me of in college"??? I thought it was the much-less-stupid "things they would not teach me back in college." Points off, "Sting." ("Sting"?) ("Hannnnsel?"--prize to whoever gets that one.)]
After Abortion: More on post-abortion grief--don't try to go it alone; and more on post-abortion depression: "Sarah Stoesz of Planned Parenthood indicated in her letter to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune that '10 percent of women who have abortions experience depressive symptoms of a lingering nature.'
"I could have gone on to include her claim, as per her linked letter, that a similar percentage of women who give birth experience lingering depression.
"I also could have pointed out that both of her claims are unsupported by current research...." more
MarriageMovement: Besides the usual Marquardtly goodness, there's a series of sharp posts from Tom Sylvester on Strom Thurmond and his daughter: "He paid his daughter to deny her own father. For over 60 years. And it was his fault that she would have been poor in the first place." Public image, limited. And Thurmond as illegitimate father.
The Volokh Conspiracy: Randy Barnett on the Ninth Circuit decision, based on Commerce Clause, invalidating prohibition of medical marijuana. I don't pretend to understand the commerce clause; on first glance this looks like the right call, and certainly I'm happy about the policy outcome.
And it's a beautiful day/For an Otto-da-Fe.
THE BAD SEX AWARDS. Arguments for censorship. One runner-up includes the term "pant-hoots," which are panting hoots, I think. Don't say I didn't warn you.
Via Arts and Letters Daily.
Via Arts and Letters Daily.
FIGHT SOCIALIZED SORCERY! "Evil makes good look better," "AWAKE! to the danger of gawking!", "RESIST PLASTICS," and many other fine slogans. Fun stuff.
Tangentially via Motime Like the Present.
Tangentially via Motime Like the Present.
SURVEY: Found randomly amid various Internet flotsam.
1. Which book are you currently reading?
JM DeMatteis/Glenn Barr, Brooklyn Dreams.
And Lend Me Your Ears, a collection of speeches edited by William Safire, but you really can't take that on the bus or in the bath, thus it's hard for the Book Ape to make progress here.
2. What book did you read last?
The Great Short Works of Franz Kafka, tr. Joachim Neugroschel. "In the Penal Colony" is the best by far. The short-shorts aren't nearly as hard-hitting or skewed as the ones in Parables and Paradoxes, which I need to reread.
3.What book are you planning on reading next?
Quimby the Mouse, that speeches book, and Plutarch's Lives if I can find my copy. If I can't find my copy and get too lazy to schlep to the library, I'll probably read The Naked Civil Servant to see how it's (/I've) aged. If I do schlep to the library, I'll probably forget about Plutarch and get sucked into reading The Book Against God.
4. Do you own most of the books you read, or do you borrow them from a library?
Half and half except for comics, which you really can't find in the DC library system.
5. Who was your favourite author when you were a child?
Diana Wynne Jones for overall achievement; Peter S. Beagle for writing my absolute favorite childhood book, The Last Unicorn.
6. What were some of your favourite books when you were a child?
Find them here... plus Diana Wynne Jones and Michael de Larrabeiti. Oh and Helen Cresswell. Good grief, didn't I read any red-blooded Amurricans?
7. Which literary character would you least like to be stranded on a desert island with and why?
Hamlet! Talk talk talk! Or, even moreso, the kid from Call It Sleep--I'd feel guilty just looking at that boy.
8. Which character would you most like to be stranded with?
Adrian Healey maybe? That could get a bit tense, though. Let's go with Donald Trefusis instead.
9. In which literary/fictional location would you most like to live?
Wow, there are just about no books set in the parts of DC I love. Let's go with the pseudo-Savannah depicted in Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil.
10. Which is the best TV/film adaptation of a book you have seen? why?
"The Last Unicorn." Script entirely from book, animation beautiful and perfectly captures both the darker tones and the sweet humor of the book. And I grew up with the Journey songs so I don't mind them.
I guess "Lion in Winter" doesn't count because it's originally a play. "Gone With the Wind" is also amazing, though not as good as the book.
11. Which is worst TV/film adaptation of a book you have seen? why?
Again, "Titus" probably doesn't count (originally a play). And really, it does an excellent job of mimicking the absurdities of the original. ("Enter Lavinia with her hands cut off, her tongue cut out, and ravished.")
12. What film adaptation do you actually like more than the book?
Hmmm... can't think of one off the top of my head.
13. What book do you like better than the film adaptation?
Ghost World
14. What is your least favourite book and why?
I doubt this is actually my least-favorite book, but I do remember loathing Silas Marner. All that blonde symbolism. I also deeply resented having to read Things Fall Apart not once but twice for class.
1. Which book are you currently reading?
JM DeMatteis/Glenn Barr, Brooklyn Dreams.
And Lend Me Your Ears, a collection of speeches edited by William Safire, but you really can't take that on the bus or in the bath, thus it's hard for the Book Ape to make progress here.
2. What book did you read last?
The Great Short Works of Franz Kafka, tr. Joachim Neugroschel. "In the Penal Colony" is the best by far. The short-shorts aren't nearly as hard-hitting or skewed as the ones in Parables and Paradoxes, which I need to reread.
3.What book are you planning on reading next?
Quimby the Mouse, that speeches book, and Plutarch's Lives if I can find my copy. If I can't find my copy and get too lazy to schlep to the library, I'll probably read The Naked Civil Servant to see how it's (/I've) aged. If I do schlep to the library, I'll probably forget about Plutarch and get sucked into reading The Book Against God.
4. Do you own most of the books you read, or do you borrow them from a library?
Half and half except for comics, which you really can't find in the DC library system.
5. Who was your favourite author when you were a child?
Diana Wynne Jones for overall achievement; Peter S. Beagle for writing my absolute favorite childhood book, The Last Unicorn.
6. What were some of your favourite books when you were a child?
Find them here... plus Diana Wynne Jones and Michael de Larrabeiti. Oh and Helen Cresswell. Good grief, didn't I read any red-blooded Amurricans?
7. Which literary character would you least like to be stranded on a desert island with and why?
Hamlet! Talk talk talk! Or, even moreso, the kid from Call It Sleep--I'd feel guilty just looking at that boy.
8. Which character would you most like to be stranded with?
Adrian Healey maybe? That could get a bit tense, though. Let's go with Donald Trefusis instead.
9. In which literary/fictional location would you most like to live?
Wow, there are just about no books set in the parts of DC I love. Let's go with the pseudo-Savannah depicted in Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil.
10. Which is the best TV/film adaptation of a book you have seen? why?
"The Last Unicorn." Script entirely from book, animation beautiful and perfectly captures both the darker tones and the sweet humor of the book. And I grew up with the Journey songs so I don't mind them.
I guess "Lion in Winter" doesn't count because it's originally a play. "Gone With the Wind" is also amazing, though not as good as the book.
11. Which is worst TV/film adaptation of a book you have seen? why?
Again, "Titus" probably doesn't count (originally a play). And really, it does an excellent job of mimicking the absurdities of the original. ("Enter Lavinia with her hands cut off, her tongue cut out, and ravished.")
12. What film adaptation do you actually like more than the book?
Hmmm... can't think of one off the top of my head.
13. What book do you like better than the film adaptation?
Ghost World
14. What is your least favourite book and why?
I doubt this is actually my least-favorite book, but I do remember loathing Silas Marner. All that blonde symbolism. I also deeply resented having to read Things Fall Apart not once but twice for class.
Monday, December 15, 2003
AFTER ABORTION: Two random thoughts: First, about 80% or so of the post-abortive women I've counseled express serious regrets. I do realize there's self-selection going on here; we're a pro-life center (although many, many of our clients view abortion as a tragic necessity) and most of our clients were raised Christian.
But I also wonder whether our attempts to understand "post-abortion grief" aren't stymied by a misunderstanding of a particular kind of Protestantism. Many of my clients have felt regret after abortion that is as deep (as far as I can tell) as any regret they've ever felt. They then confess to Christ, ask for forgiveness, and know that Jesus forgives; and they move on, as they move on from other actions that they know are grave sins. Because all this is private and can happen in a moment (praying the Sinner's Prayer, for example, or responding to an altar call), I think it can look, to people raised outside this particular strain of Protestantism, less weighty and less of a relief of a terrible burden than it really is. These women speak very precisely about how they've dealt with their grief and moved on; but the way they deal with grief and regret over abortion is the way they would deal with grief and regret over any terrible sin. They give it to God and move on.
That can be off-putting to people who come to post-abortive women with preconceived notions that they should feel no regret or that they should feel a constant, inconsolable ache. Fortunately, I'd been so thoroughly indoctrinated into abortion-rights propaganda that I was expecting very few of our post-abortive clients to express regret at all, so I was startled enough to pay attention when that turned out not to be true.
NOTE: I edited this post because Avram of Pigs and Fishes pointed out that the thing that prompted these thoughts, a link on After Abortion that is actually making a different point, doesn't say what I thought it said--should have been much more careful: "Eve --
"Did you follow the link to the StarTribune article? It says 'Studies show that 10 percent of women who have abortions experience depressive symptoms of a lingering nature. The same symptoms occur in just as many women after childbirth.' The implications are a bit different with that second sentence attached.
"According to the National Institute of Mental Health, that's about the same as the percentage of the general adult American population (9.5%) that suffers clinical depression, and lower than the percentage
of women in general (12%) that are affected by a depressive disorder each year."
I shouldn't've been linking to the Star-Tribune piece anyway, since what I wanted to write about was post-abortion grief and regret (emotional and spiritual categories) rather than depression (medical category). Apologies....
But I also wonder whether our attempts to understand "post-abortion grief" aren't stymied by a misunderstanding of a particular kind of Protestantism. Many of my clients have felt regret after abortion that is as deep (as far as I can tell) as any regret they've ever felt. They then confess to Christ, ask for forgiveness, and know that Jesus forgives; and they move on, as they move on from other actions that they know are grave sins. Because all this is private and can happen in a moment (praying the Sinner's Prayer, for example, or responding to an altar call), I think it can look, to people raised outside this particular strain of Protestantism, less weighty and less of a relief of a terrible burden than it really is. These women speak very precisely about how they've dealt with their grief and moved on; but the way they deal with grief and regret over abortion is the way they would deal with grief and regret over any terrible sin. They give it to God and move on.
That can be off-putting to people who come to post-abortive women with preconceived notions that they should feel no regret or that they should feel a constant, inconsolable ache. Fortunately, I'd been so thoroughly indoctrinated into abortion-rights propaganda that I was expecting very few of our post-abortive clients to express regret at all, so I was startled enough to pay attention when that turned out not to be true.
NOTE: I edited this post because Avram of Pigs and Fishes pointed out that the thing that prompted these thoughts, a link on After Abortion that is actually making a different point, doesn't say what I thought it said--should have been much more careful: "Eve --
"Did you follow the link to the StarTribune article? It says 'Studies show that 10 percent of women who have abortions experience depressive symptoms of a lingering nature. The same symptoms occur in just as many women after childbirth.' The implications are a bit different with that second sentence attached.
"According to the National Institute of Mental Health, that's about the same as the percentage of the general adult American population (9.5%) that suffers clinical depression, and lower than the percentage
of women in general (12%) that are affected by a depressive disorder each year."
I shouldn't've been linking to the Star-Tribune piece anyway, since what I wanted to write about was post-abortion grief and regret (emotional and spiritual categories) rather than depression (medical category). Apologies....
JANUARY 2003 REASON DEBATE ON INVASION OF IRAQ: John Mueller (anti-invasion) vs. Brink Lindsey (pro). Worth a read, now.
My take: Mueller misses the point of the North Korea comparison (he assumes Saddam-nukes are only geopolitically dangerous if Saddam makes the incredibly stupid decision to use them, rather than the not-stupid-at-all decision to use them as major leverage at the bargaining table) and somehow forgets that Saddam's sons were possibly more freakazoid than their father.
He also conflates two kinds of threats: "One can’t simultaneously maintain that Iraq’s military forces will readily defect and can easily be walked over--a common assumption among our war makers--and also that this same pathetic military presents a serious international threat." I don't think any warmongers were arguing that Saddam's troops were the problem.
And he muddies distinctions between kinds of tyrants. Yeah, they're all egomaniacs. But nobody thinks Jean-Bertrand Aristide (or Papa Doc Duvalier!), or Fidel Castro, is trying to develop WMDs. How come?
However, he makes good points about the oil market, the terrorism ties, and the difference between international response to the Iran/Iraq war and international response to any future ("future" from the January 2003 perspective of course) Iraqi invasion of Kuwait or elsewhere.
Lindsey relies on the belief that Saddam was in the process of developing WMDs, which seems, at this point, either unlikely or a great anti-war argument (= war led to WMDs being shipped out of Iraq to points unknown). Sure OK, pretty much everyone, including anti-war types, thought Saddam was amassing WMDs. Why wouldn't he? Still, this point tells strongly against Lindsey today.
Lindsey makes strong points about Saddam's wigfest character and Mueller's blitheness.
The debate leaves me as clouded as ever--I tend to think Mueller more persuasive--but it is definitely worth a read. Via Hit & Run.
My take: Mueller misses the point of the North Korea comparison (he assumes Saddam-nukes are only geopolitically dangerous if Saddam makes the incredibly stupid decision to use them, rather than the not-stupid-at-all decision to use them as major leverage at the bargaining table) and somehow forgets that Saddam's sons were possibly more freakazoid than their father.
He also conflates two kinds of threats: "One can’t simultaneously maintain that Iraq’s military forces will readily defect and can easily be walked over--a common assumption among our war makers--and also that this same pathetic military presents a serious international threat." I don't think any warmongers were arguing that Saddam's troops were the problem.
And he muddies distinctions between kinds of tyrants. Yeah, they're all egomaniacs. But nobody thinks Jean-Bertrand Aristide (or Papa Doc Duvalier!), or Fidel Castro, is trying to develop WMDs. How come?
However, he makes good points about the oil market, the terrorism ties, and the difference between international response to the Iran/Iraq war and international response to any future ("future" from the January 2003 perspective of course) Iraqi invasion of Kuwait or elsewhere.
Lindsey relies on the belief that Saddam was in the process of developing WMDs, which seems, at this point, either unlikely or a great anti-war argument (= war led to WMDs being shipped out of Iraq to points unknown). Sure OK, pretty much everyone, including anti-war types, thought Saddam was amassing WMDs. Why wouldn't he? Still, this point tells strongly against Lindsey today.
Lindsey makes strong points about Saddam's wigfest character and Mueller's blitheness.
The debate leaves me as clouded as ever--I tend to think Mueller more persuasive--but it is definitely worth a read. Via Hit & Run.
"DESIRE: JOY DIVISION": The penultimate chapter of the Holly-Laila-Suha story. I hate the title to this section but I don't have a better one yet. Anyway, things fall apart here. This section needs to be longer, but since I've been posting rough drafts, I'll show you the skeleton. You can read the whole story so far starting here, or just get the new bit here.
The next section's gonna be fun. Twist ending.
The next section's gonna be fun. Twist ending.
THE SAINT LINUS REVIEW: A magazine I probably can't contribute to, but you might. For Catholic poetry and short prose. Link via Mark Shea.
1999, THE ABORTION NUMBERS: Multiple abortions; abortions and race; which states report the most abortions (not all states report); deaths from legal abortion; more.
Via E-Pression.
Via E-Pression.
Animals strike curious poses;
They watch the blog--
The blog between me and you...
Amptoons: Two threads on non-superhero comics recommendations.
Dappled Things: His sermon on the feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe: We are all guadalupanos! "The first thing we need to consider is what is important to the Virgin. The Virgin appeared to a poor Indian and spoke to him in the only language he knew, not the conquerors' Spanish, but the native Nahuatl. She came not to bring more oppression, but to bring a people to the Gospel. Through her intervention, Latin America became Catholic and traded in the bloody cult of the local gods for the merciful religion of the Virgin's Son. Throughout the years, the image of this Virgin would accompany Mexicans in their greatest needs and stand alongside the poor and marginalized without fail. To be guadalupano, then, means in some sense to follow the Virgin's lead. It means to stand up for the weak, the powerless, and those stripped of their rights: the unborn children menaced by abortion; those without food to eat; those without places to live; the people afflicted by war, persecution, and violence of every kind; immigrants, with and without papers; whoever is forced to the margins of society and left at the mercy of the stronger. If these people are important to her, then they had better be important to us." more
Mark Shea: Quite a lot of interesting stuff, including how Zell Miller became pro-life.
They watch the blog--
The blog between me and you...
Amptoons: Two threads on non-superhero comics recommendations.
Dappled Things: His sermon on the feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe: We are all guadalupanos! "The first thing we need to consider is what is important to the Virgin. The Virgin appeared to a poor Indian and spoke to him in the only language he knew, not the conquerors' Spanish, but the native Nahuatl. She came not to bring more oppression, but to bring a people to the Gospel. Through her intervention, Latin America became Catholic and traded in the bloody cult of the local gods for the merciful religion of the Virgin's Son. Throughout the years, the image of this Virgin would accompany Mexicans in their greatest needs and stand alongside the poor and marginalized without fail. To be guadalupano, then, means in some sense to follow the Virgin's lead. It means to stand up for the weak, the powerless, and those stripped of their rights: the unborn children menaced by abortion; those without food to eat; those without places to live; the people afflicted by war, persecution, and violence of every kind; immigrants, with and without papers; whoever is forced to the margins of society and left at the mercy of the stronger. If these people are important to her, then they had better be important to us." more
Mark Shea: Quite a lot of interesting stuff, including how Zell Miller became pro-life.
WHICH (NOT WHAT!) MUPPET ARE YOU? I can't make the site open right now, but last night I was the big freaky thing that looks like it crawled out of a trash can--I think its name may be Blossom?
No, here we go, it's Sweetums: "You are Sweetums. A hard exterior covers up the soft sweet center of your soul. And you love to eat humans. SPECIAL TALENTS: Really big dance steps. FAVORITE MOVIE: 'Big' QUOTE: 'Wait for me!' LAST BOOK READ: 'Taming Your Outer Beast' NEVER LEAVES HOME WITHOUT: Robin the Frog"
Hmmmm...
Also via Tepper.
No, here we go, it's Sweetums: "You are Sweetums. A hard exterior covers up the soft sweet center of your soul. And you love to eat humans. SPECIAL TALENTS: Really big dance steps. FAVORITE MOVIE: 'Big' QUOTE: 'Wait for me!' LAST BOOK READ: 'Taming Your Outer Beast' NEVER LEAVES HOME WITHOUT: Robin the Frog"
Hmmmm...
Also via Tepper.
WHICH ROMANCE MOVIE BEST REPRESENTS YOUR LOVE LIFE? I'm "Casablanca": "'You must remember this, a kiss is still a kiss.' Your romance is Casablanca. A classic story of love in trying times, chock full of both cynicism and hope. You obviously believe in true love, but you're also
constantly aware of practicality and societal expectations. That's not always fun, but at least it's realistic. Try not to let the Nazis get you down too much."
Via Dave Tepper.
constantly aware of practicality and societal expectations. That's not always fun, but at least it's realistic. Try not to let the Nazis get you down too much."
Via Dave Tepper.
IRS VS BOOKSTORES UPDATE: Corner Comics capitulates--not enough money to fight the IRS on their terms; Journalista! takes a stab at untangling the relevant tax law, and wishes there were a trade organization to help retailers in situations like this.
When tyrants tremble, sick with fear,
And hear their death-knell ringing,
When friends rejoice both far and near,
How can I keep from singing?
Iraqi blog round-ups here and here.
Plus more here (must-read): "...When he announced 'We got him' everyone in the room cheered out loud. The following video of Saddam in his long hair and beard was a shock to us all. My grandmother burst in tears.
"...I had no reason to, but I felt humiliated. I sank into an overwhelming depression and sadness, and I had a desperate need to get terribly drunk. I should have felt joy but I didn't. And I'm still disappointed with myself.
"I went out again, the streets were empty now, everyone was at home watching the news. Celebratory gunfire continued for hours. In the evening, I went out to find armed teenagers filling our street carrying Saddam's pictures. They were shouting the vilest things about Sistani, Hakim, and even Ali Bin Abi Talib. Some of the mob were dressed in Fedayeen clothes with grenades and explosives in their hands. I got foolish and tried to take photographs. They dragged me in their midst and I thought this was it. Some accused me of being a spy, and others shouted 'Kill the bastard.' My parents and some neighbours were all over me and convinced the kids to leave me alone. After that they blocked the street and started to threaten passing cars, all the while shooting in the air. 4 or 5 IP cars showed up and the crowd dissipated. Shops closed and the streets were empty again." more
and here: "We both agree that this is the last chance for the radical Shii to make a mark. It could amount to a Revolution within the Occupation. ...I have argued that since Iran is on its last legs, and in sight of a 'velvet' revolution itself, within, say, 9-12 months, the obvious way for the Mullahs to shore up their position would be to destabilise Iraq. The majority of Iraqi Shii are moderate, but the mood is distinctly anti-American because that is the nature of the beast : they are Muslims and the Americans are not. " more
and here: "I just talked to some Iraqi friends in Baghdad and here's what they report...."
Oh and I agree with Mark Shea that this is the right reaction, and a hard one: "We want to see him in a cage bending more and more, humiliated more and more, just as he forced all the Iraqis to bend to him, like they were his slaves. But we will not be like him, we will give him a fair trial, and he will get just what he deserves, although I have no idea what does he really deserve."
Much commentary from varying perspectives at Oxblog, The Corner, and Unqualified Offerings, all very much worth your time. Jonathan Adler makes the best case I've heard so far for an international tribunal; UO points out the shakiness of the "Atta trained with Abu Nidal in Baghdad" story. And I've added Baghdad Skies to the blogroll--found via BuzzMachine, which I should also add back.
And hear their death-knell ringing,
When friends rejoice both far and near,
How can I keep from singing?
Iraqi blog round-ups here and here.
Plus more here (must-read): "...When he announced 'We got him' everyone in the room cheered out loud. The following video of Saddam in his long hair and beard was a shock to us all. My grandmother burst in tears.
"...I had no reason to, but I felt humiliated. I sank into an overwhelming depression and sadness, and I had a desperate need to get terribly drunk. I should have felt joy but I didn't. And I'm still disappointed with myself.
"I went out again, the streets were empty now, everyone was at home watching the news. Celebratory gunfire continued for hours. In the evening, I went out to find armed teenagers filling our street carrying Saddam's pictures. They were shouting the vilest things about Sistani, Hakim, and even Ali Bin Abi Talib. Some of the mob were dressed in Fedayeen clothes with grenades and explosives in their hands. I got foolish and tried to take photographs. They dragged me in their midst and I thought this was it. Some accused me of being a spy, and others shouted 'Kill the bastard.' My parents and some neighbours were all over me and convinced the kids to leave me alone. After that they blocked the street and started to threaten passing cars, all the while shooting in the air. 4 or 5 IP cars showed up and the crowd dissipated. Shops closed and the streets were empty again." more
and here: "We both agree that this is the last chance for the radical Shii to make a mark. It could amount to a Revolution within the Occupation. ...I have argued that since Iran is on its last legs, and in sight of a 'velvet' revolution itself, within, say, 9-12 months, the obvious way for the Mullahs to shore up their position would be to destabilise Iraq. The majority of Iraqi Shii are moderate, but the mood is distinctly anti-American because that is the nature of the beast : they are Muslims and the Americans are not. " more
and here: "I just talked to some Iraqi friends in Baghdad and here's what they report...."
Oh and I agree with Mark Shea that this is the right reaction, and a hard one: "We want to see him in a cage bending more and more, humiliated more and more, just as he forced all the Iraqis to bend to him, like they were his slaves. But we will not be like him, we will give him a fair trial, and he will get just what he deserves, although I have no idea what does he really deserve."
Much commentary from varying perspectives at Oxblog, The Corner, and Unqualified Offerings, all very much worth your time. Jonathan Adler makes the best case I've heard so far for an international tribunal; UO points out the shakiness of the "Atta trained with Abu Nidal in Baghdad" story. And I've added Baghdad Skies to the blogroll--found via BuzzMachine, which I should also add back.
Friday, December 12, 2003
RAMESH PONNURU ON JUDICIAL REFORM: "One sometimes runs across conservatives who are hostile in principle to judicial review and want to abolish it. I'm not one of them, although I definitely understand the impulse. I do, however, want to strengthen constitutional checks on the power of the federal judiciary. For example, I'd like to see Congress exercise its power to regulate the courts' jurisdiction. Most conservatives, and especially most conservative lawyers, have preferred to concentrate their efforts on getting "good judges" confirmed. They have had a variety of reasons for this preference. One of those reasons--not the most important reason, as it happens, but a reason--is that anything that tends to weaken the ability of the federal judiciary to invalidate laws would weaken its ability to invalidate laws that conservatives believe are unconstitutional.
"Liberals (and libertarians) may want the courts to strike down laws against abortion and pornography. Conservatives (and libertarians) want the Court to protect political speech, commercial speech, federalism, and executive-branch powers from laws that meddle with them. They want the Court to strike down racial preferences. They want it to invalidate state laws that they regard as violations of religious liberty (such as the Blaine amendments that prohibit government funding for religious schools).
"Whether conservatives are right to want all of these things is a question for another day. My point today is that in practice, conservatives don't get many of them."
more
"Liberals (and libertarians) may want the courts to strike down laws against abortion and pornography. Conservatives (and libertarians) want the Court to protect political speech, commercial speech, federalism, and executive-branch powers from laws that meddle with them. They want the Court to strike down racial preferences. They want it to invalidate state laws that they regard as violations of religious liberty (such as the Blaine amendments that prohibit government funding for religious schools).
"Whether conservatives are right to want all of these things is a question for another day. My point today is that in practice, conservatives don't get many of them."
more
SAMPLE LETTER TO A REPRESENTATIVE about the Corner Comics/IRS vs. comic shops, used bookstores, and assorted small businesses mishegoss.
FORUM 18: "Forum 18 believes that religious freedom is a fundamental human right, which is essential for the dignity of humanity and for true freedom. ...
"Forum 18 News Service (F18News) is a Christian initiative which is independent of any one church or religious group. Its independence is safeguarded by a board whose members are Protestant, Orthodox and Catholic Christians, and who are responsible for matters of policy and fundraising. F18News is committed to Jesus Christ's command to do to others what you would have them do to you, and so reports on threats and actions against the religious freedom of all people, regardless of their religious affiliation."
This seems to be what has taken the Keston News Service's place, providing on-the-ground reporting on religious freedom in places like Uzbekistan, Mongolia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan. Definitely worth a look.
"Forum 18 News Service (F18News) is a Christian initiative which is independent of any one church or religious group. Its independence is safeguarded by a board whose members are Protestant, Orthodox and Catholic Christians, and who are responsible for matters of policy and fundraising. F18News is committed to Jesus Christ's command to do to others what you would have them do to you, and so reports on threats and actions against the religious freedom of all people, regardless of their religious affiliation."
This seems to be what has taken the Keston News Service's place, providing on-the-ground reporting on religious freedom in places like Uzbekistan, Mongolia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan. Definitely worth a look.
THE POWER TO TAX IS THE POWER TO DESTROY BOOKSTORES?: I know there are lawyers and legal experts who read this blog! Here's a really troubling case for you all to look at:
"The owner of my local comic shop, Paige Gifford, was approached by the IRS in March for a 'compliance audit.' The brand-spankin new agent they had put on her case didn't believe she could make a living selling comics. Once she was able to prove that she was in compliance, and not selling something on the side, and that yes, she did make a living selling comic books, the agent went after her inventory. He said that he knew how much baseball cards are worth, and so old comics must be worth a lot of money. He estimated how much her backstock was worth (based on his own bizarre calculation). He then told her that she hadn't paid taxes on her inventory, and that she owed $14,000 in taxes. She's a small business owner. $14,000 is a lot of money.
"So she got some help. At times the thing seemed almost resolved. But the IRS is determined to run her out of business. Within the last week she was told that she cannot have any backstock of comics. She has to destroy her backstock--shred or burn every comic book--by December 31st in order to get out of the debt. And she needs a receipt to prove that she destroyed the comics. Otherwise, she owes the IRS $14,000, and will owe the IRS an inventory tax every year from here on out. Even though her lawyer and accountant are convinced that she's completely in compliance with every pertainable law.
"I don't know about you, but if this audit is applied equally and across the board on all small-business owners, I don't think there will be any bookstores or comic book stores left that are locally owned. You cannot have a decent comic shop without backstock, and according to the IRS, backstock is NOT ALLOWED."
updates
a letter from the shop owner
links to taxpayers' groups
more: "This case has the power to put most of the country's comic book stores, and most of the country's used book stores, out of business. It probably has implications for second-hand stores of all kinds, which means it poses a huge danger to readers and consumers. You and I will have fewer choices and the ones left to you will cost you more."
more
comments-box discussion of the tax-technical issues here
"The owner of my local comic shop, Paige Gifford, was approached by the IRS in March for a 'compliance audit.' The brand-spankin new agent they had put on her case didn't believe she could make a living selling comics. Once she was able to prove that she was in compliance, and not selling something on the side, and that yes, she did make a living selling comic books, the agent went after her inventory. He said that he knew how much baseball cards are worth, and so old comics must be worth a lot of money. He estimated how much her backstock was worth (based on his own bizarre calculation). He then told her that she hadn't paid taxes on her inventory, and that she owed $14,000 in taxes. She's a small business owner. $14,000 is a lot of money.
"So she got some help. At times the thing seemed almost resolved. But the IRS is determined to run her out of business. Within the last week she was told that she cannot have any backstock of comics. She has to destroy her backstock--shred or burn every comic book--by December 31st in order to get out of the debt. And she needs a receipt to prove that she destroyed the comics. Otherwise, she owes the IRS $14,000, and will owe the IRS an inventory tax every year from here on out. Even though her lawyer and accountant are convinced that she's completely in compliance with every pertainable law.
"I don't know about you, but if this audit is applied equally and across the board on all small-business owners, I don't think there will be any bookstores or comic book stores left that are locally owned. You cannot have a decent comic shop without backstock, and according to the IRS, backstock is NOT ALLOWED."
updates
a letter from the shop owner
links to taxpayers' groups
more: "This case has the power to put most of the country's comic book stores, and most of the country's used book stores, out of business. It probably has implications for second-hand stores of all kinds, which means it poses a huge danger to readers and consumers. You and I will have fewer choices and the ones left to you will cost you more."
more
comments-box discussion of the tax-technical issues here
CLONING IN NEW JERSEY: From the Weekly Standard: USING "embryonic stem cell research" (ESCR) as a Trojan Horse, the authors of New Jersey Assembly Bill 2840 are trying to sneak one of the most radical human cloning legalization schemes ever proposed into law. How radical is A-2840? If the bill passes, it will be legal in New Jersey to implant cloned human embryos into wombs, gestate them for up to nine months, and then destroy them for use in research.
more
Me on embryo-destructive research.
more
Me on embryo-destructive research.
If you want to touch the sky
Just put a blogwatch in your eye...
Hit & Run slams the campaign finance reform decision: "That there's a 'media exemption' only makes it more grotesque--one powerful faction in society (elected officials) throwing a bone to another (the press)."
And Volokh hits the other side of the "newspapers are corporations too" coin: "I've mentioned before that I think corporate speech should be just a protected as noncorporate speech. One piece of evidence for this position is that newspapers, magazines, broadcasters, and other media outlets tend to be corporations, too. So far, the restrictions on corporate speech related to campaigns have excluded the media, at least as to some of its functions ('news stor[ies], commentar[ies], or editorial[s],' in the BCRA statute that was just upheld). But (1) it's not clear why some corporations should have more statutory speech rights than others, and (2) these exemptions from the media are, under the Court's logic, matters of legislative charity; legislatures could, if they wanted to, restrict newspapers, TV stations, and cable programs owned by corporations just as they restrict speech by other corporations."
I don't think we know whether the long-range effects of the CFR bill will be good for media corporations (they become proportionately much bigger fish in a proportionately smaller pond), bad for media corporations (if future legislation does try to treat e.g. FoxNews as a corporation just like any other), or neutral (because there are so many loopholes--apparently the NRA is considering forming a media corporation to run its near-election issue ads--that CFR just won't do much). But looking at the newspapers vs. other corporation issue, in general, is a great way to see the problems with CFR. Bleah.
Oxblog: Hee!
There's a whole blog devoted to the theory of punishment (and related legal and philosophical questions). Who knew? It looks super-intriguing; via L. Solum.
Henry Rollins tours with the USO.
Just put a blogwatch in your eye...
Hit & Run slams the campaign finance reform decision: "That there's a 'media exemption' only makes it more grotesque--one powerful faction in society (elected officials) throwing a bone to another (the press)."
And Volokh hits the other side of the "newspapers are corporations too" coin: "I've mentioned before that I think corporate speech should be just a protected as noncorporate speech. One piece of evidence for this position is that newspapers, magazines, broadcasters, and other media outlets tend to be corporations, too. So far, the restrictions on corporate speech related to campaigns have excluded the media, at least as to some of its functions ('news stor[ies], commentar[ies], or editorial[s],' in the BCRA statute that was just upheld). But (1) it's not clear why some corporations should have more statutory speech rights than others, and (2) these exemptions from the media are, under the Court's logic, matters of legislative charity; legislatures could, if they wanted to, restrict newspapers, TV stations, and cable programs owned by corporations just as they restrict speech by other corporations."
I don't think we know whether the long-range effects of the CFR bill will be good for media corporations (they become proportionately much bigger fish in a proportionately smaller pond), bad for media corporations (if future legislation does try to treat e.g. FoxNews as a corporation just like any other), or neutral (because there are so many loopholes--apparently the NRA is considering forming a media corporation to run its near-election issue ads--that CFR just won't do much). But looking at the newspapers vs. other corporation issue, in general, is a great way to see the problems with CFR. Bleah.
Oxblog: Hee!
There's a whole blog devoted to the theory of punishment (and related legal and philosophical questions). Who knew? It looks super-intriguing; via L. Solum.
Henry Rollins tours with the USO.
IRAQI PROTESTERS OUST APPOINTED GOVERNOR:
The demonstrators converged on the provincial governor's office on Sunday with banners, sleeping mats, cooking pots and a simple demand: Iskander Jawad Witwit should quit.
After three days and nights of continuous protests, Witwit did just that. But the demonstrators have refused to budge.
As soon as Witwit resigned, the local representative of the U.S. occupation authority appointed a former Iraqi air force officer as acting governor. To the protesters, that was unacceptable. The new governor, they insisted, should be chosen not by an American but by Iraqis -- through an election.
"Yes, yes for elections!" shouted the protesters, a collection of students, clerics and middle-aged professionals whose ranks swelled to more than 1,000 on Thursday. "No, no to appointment!"
The protesters have pledged to continue their sit-in outside the governor's office -- they have erected tents and dug latrines -- until their demand is met. Leaders of Hilla's largest labor unions have vowed to hold a general strike starting Saturday in support of elections.
Local leaders described the passionate but peaceful demonstration in this predominantly Shiite Muslim city as a preview of what U.S. occupiers will face if they follow through with a plan to select a provisional Iraqi government through regional caucuses instead of general elections. Although elections have become an increasingly popular rallying cry in Shiite-dominated central and southern Iraq, the protest here is the first indication that mainstream Shiites are willing to take to the streets to press the issue, adding a volatile new element to the country's impending political transition.
more
OxDem agrees with the demonstrators, by the way.
The demonstrators converged on the provincial governor's office on Sunday with banners, sleeping mats, cooking pots and a simple demand: Iskander Jawad Witwit should quit.
After three days and nights of continuous protests, Witwit did just that. But the demonstrators have refused to budge.
As soon as Witwit resigned, the local representative of the U.S. occupation authority appointed a former Iraqi air force officer as acting governor. To the protesters, that was unacceptable. The new governor, they insisted, should be chosen not by an American but by Iraqis -- through an election.
"Yes, yes for elections!" shouted the protesters, a collection of students, clerics and middle-aged professionals whose ranks swelled to more than 1,000 on Thursday. "No, no to appointment!"
The protesters have pledged to continue their sit-in outside the governor's office -- they have erected tents and dug latrines -- until their demand is met. Leaders of Hilla's largest labor unions have vowed to hold a general strike starting Saturday in support of elections.
Local leaders described the passionate but peaceful demonstration in this predominantly Shiite Muslim city as a preview of what U.S. occupiers will face if they follow through with a plan to select a provisional Iraqi government through regional caucuses instead of general elections. Although elections have become an increasingly popular rallying cry in Shiite-dominated central and southern Iraq, the protest here is the first indication that mainstream Shiites are willing to take to the streets to press the issue, adding a volatile new element to the country's impending political transition.
more
OxDem agrees with the demonstrators, by the way.
WHICH LOGICAL FALLACY ARE YOU? I'm Ad Hominem: "You are rude and inconsiderate. You don't like people and would rather not participate in public speaking as a general rule . . .except for the part where you get to make novices cry. That's fun."
Via ViciousXRedDragon.
Via ViciousXRedDragon.
WHAT KIND OF POSTMODERNIST ARE YOU? I'm a Tortured Conceptual Artist--have to say this sounds sadly true: "Your fellow postmodernists call you an anachronism, but you've never cared much about the opinions of others. After all, most of them are far too simple-minded to appreciate the nuances of your work. They talk, while you are part of a lived tradition."
Via Motime Like the Present.
Via Motime Like the Present.
Thursday, December 11, 2003
BELOW you will find: a long thing about the Establishment Clause; a silly thing about the Establishment Clause; two good Advent homilies; comparing comics to works in other media--this might be a place to find comics recommendations if you're interested and have not read much of 'em before; "how I got into comics"--medium vs genre, and problems in the industry; Martin Amis on porn.
I EDUCATE. YOU INDOCTRINATE. THEY BRAINWASH. If Joshua Davey had kept his scholarship, would that constitute a state establishment of Christianity?
Here, let me quote Dalia Lithwick: "The case was brought by Joshua Davey after a university scholarship he'd been given by the state of Washington was rescinded when he declared that one of his two majors would be in 'pastoral ministries' at a Christian college in Kirkland, Wash. Washington is one of 37 states with broader prohibitions on public spending for religious education than is required under the federal constitution. The state's constitution bars the spending of public monies on religious instruction, and they've drawn a distinction between spending on religion when it's taught in a secular manner and spending on training students for the ministry. Davey and his supporters, including the Bush administration, contend that this discriminates against the religious. Washington says it's just policing the wall between church and state."
It seems to me that John "Grotesque Anatomy" Jakala is arguing that Davey's scholarship would in fact represent establishment of religion--most explicitly in his comments box, in response to a column by me (admittedly, a column that, on re-reading, I agree is less germane to the points Jakala'd initially been making than I'd thought). If I'm misunderstanding, I do apologize, though.
The belief that discrimination against religious institutions is required by the Constitution, in order to prevent establishment of religion, is a pretty common interpretation. Thus school vouchers shouldn't be used at parochial schools or yeshivas or whatever.
I don't know whether barring religiously-affiliated schools from public scholarships (and vouchers are just scholarships, of course) is constitutionally permitted. I don't know whether Davey should win his case. I suspect he should, honestly; my reasoning is much like Eugene Volokh's here.
But I am much more sure that barring religiously-affiliated schools from public scholarships is not constitutionally required. Using a voucher or other public scholarship at a religious school is not an establishment of religion, assuming that the same voucher or scholarship could just as well be used at a non-religious school or a school professing a different religion.
Maybe some examples will help. Are any of the following public-scholarship recipients participating in establishment of religion? And, if all these cases involve the same scholarship fund... what religion, exactly, is being established?
1) Suzy Catholic studies theology at Notre Dame; she thinks she might maybe want to be a nun, and so she makes sure to take courses geared toward Carmelite spirituality (good grief, I hope they have such courses at ND!), but she maybe wants to be a comparative literature professor instead.
2) Jacob Evangelical studies medieval Islam at Georgetown (a Catholic university, or so they tell me) so he can do interfaith work and possibly missions work in an Islamic country.
3) Tricia Atheist majors in religious studies at Yale, but in her sophomore year, while still on scholarship, she converts to Judaism and refocuses her studies to prepare her for the rabbinate. Is this case different if Tricia a) never converts, remaining the only atheist in the rel-stud major? (these things do happen!), or b) remains an atheist, but attends a religiously-affiliated school?
4) Marc Catholic studies theology at Georgetown in order to get a better grounding in his faith, even though what he actually plans to be is a consultant.
5) Jenna Jew double majors in psychology and philosophy at Yale (she has no social life) in hopes that these courses will help her be a better rabbi. Does it matter if one of her professors, himself a rabbi, teaches with an eye toward pastoral work?
6) Sally Catholic (Suzy's sister), who also wants to be a nun, studies philosophy at Notre Dame, with a specialization in natural law. Three of her seven classmates (all in the same scholarship program) are Catholic; two are atheists; one is Jewish; one is a Deist, yes, a Deist.
None of these cases seem to me to be substantively, radically different from Joshua Davey's case. More importantly, if all of them are possible outcomes of the scholarship program, I really can't see how it's "establishing" any religion, or asserting a preference for religion over not-religion. (Or asserting a preference for not-religion over religion.) In fact, such a scholarship program would seem to me to be shying away as carefully as possible from anything resembling establishment of any religious belief or belief about religion. If religion is being established, again... what religion is it?
And I worry that Jakala's use of language (which I expect is the result of the quick writing one uses in comments boxes, rather than some carefully thought-through phrasing--I don't want to imply that this is how he'd write if he were writing a blog post or an op-ed or whatever) echoes the fear that underlies many of these discussions. He writes, "I don't care if I pay for children to be taught views I disagree with. But I do care if I pay for children to be indoctrinated in a particular religious tradition."
This switch from "taught" to "indoctrinated" reminds me of the old line about dirty pictures: "What I like is erotica. What you like is pornography. What they like is smut." Hence the title of this post.
Is "indoctrinating" children in a particular religious tradition different from/worse than "indoctrinating" them in a particular political or philosophical tradition (like the Afrocentrism I discussed in my column) or a particular interpretation of US history? How come? Do all religious schools "indoctrinate"? Do no non-religious schools indoctrinate? Do no public schools indoctrinate? (Am I asking "gimme" questions? :) )
This stuff becomes even harder when we're discussing colleges, since the students typically have much more choice in where they go (so "indoctrination" concerns should recede, I think) and the array of worldviews presented by the schools' professors tends to vary more. Georgetown, Notre Dame etc. offer scores of non-Catholic professors of philosophy and theology; Yale and that cold school with the weird Puritan mascot offer several deeply religious professors of ditto. As it happens, I don't think intra-university religious diversity should matter to this question--what should matter is whether the student could use the scholarship at schools of any religion or none--but it might matter to some people, so I mention it.
So yeah--the "myth of neutrality" that I discuss in that Jewish World Review column can't even be talked about until we agree on the nature of religious establishment, which so far, it seems like Jakala and I don't. I hope this has made my position at least a bit clearer.
Here, let me quote Dalia Lithwick: "The case was brought by Joshua Davey after a university scholarship he'd been given by the state of Washington was rescinded when he declared that one of his two majors would be in 'pastoral ministries' at a Christian college in Kirkland, Wash. Washington is one of 37 states with broader prohibitions on public spending for religious education than is required under the federal constitution. The state's constitution bars the spending of public monies on religious instruction, and they've drawn a distinction between spending on religion when it's taught in a secular manner and spending on training students for the ministry. Davey and his supporters, including the Bush administration, contend that this discriminates against the religious. Washington says it's just policing the wall between church and state."
It seems to me that John "Grotesque Anatomy" Jakala is arguing that Davey's scholarship would in fact represent establishment of religion--most explicitly in his comments box, in response to a column by me (admittedly, a column that, on re-reading, I agree is less germane to the points Jakala'd initially been making than I'd thought). If I'm misunderstanding, I do apologize, though.
The belief that discrimination against religious institutions is required by the Constitution, in order to prevent establishment of religion, is a pretty common interpretation. Thus school vouchers shouldn't be used at parochial schools or yeshivas or whatever.
I don't know whether barring religiously-affiliated schools from public scholarships (and vouchers are just scholarships, of course) is constitutionally permitted. I don't know whether Davey should win his case. I suspect he should, honestly; my reasoning is much like Eugene Volokh's here.
But I am much more sure that barring religiously-affiliated schools from public scholarships is not constitutionally required. Using a voucher or other public scholarship at a religious school is not an establishment of religion, assuming that the same voucher or scholarship could just as well be used at a non-religious school or a school professing a different religion.
Maybe some examples will help. Are any of the following public-scholarship recipients participating in establishment of religion? And, if all these cases involve the same scholarship fund... what religion, exactly, is being established?
1) Suzy Catholic studies theology at Notre Dame; she thinks she might maybe want to be a nun, and so she makes sure to take courses geared toward Carmelite spirituality (good grief, I hope they have such courses at ND!), but she maybe wants to be a comparative literature professor instead.
2) Jacob Evangelical studies medieval Islam at Georgetown (a Catholic university, or so they tell me) so he can do interfaith work and possibly missions work in an Islamic country.
3) Tricia Atheist majors in religious studies at Yale, but in her sophomore year, while still on scholarship, she converts to Judaism and refocuses her studies to prepare her for the rabbinate. Is this case different if Tricia a) never converts, remaining the only atheist in the rel-stud major? (these things do happen!), or b) remains an atheist, but attends a religiously-affiliated school?
4) Marc Catholic studies theology at Georgetown in order to get a better grounding in his faith, even though what he actually plans to be is a consultant.
5) Jenna Jew double majors in psychology and philosophy at Yale (she has no social life) in hopes that these courses will help her be a better rabbi. Does it matter if one of her professors, himself a rabbi, teaches with an eye toward pastoral work?
6) Sally Catholic (Suzy's sister), who also wants to be a nun, studies philosophy at Notre Dame, with a specialization in natural law. Three of her seven classmates (all in the same scholarship program) are Catholic; two are atheists; one is Jewish; one is a Deist, yes, a Deist.
None of these cases seem to me to be substantively, radically different from Joshua Davey's case. More importantly, if all of them are possible outcomes of the scholarship program, I really can't see how it's "establishing" any religion, or asserting a preference for religion over not-religion. (Or asserting a preference for not-religion over religion.) In fact, such a scholarship program would seem to me to be shying away as carefully as possible from anything resembling establishment of any religious belief or belief about religion. If religion is being established, again... what religion is it?
And I worry that Jakala's use of language (which I expect is the result of the quick writing one uses in comments boxes, rather than some carefully thought-through phrasing--I don't want to imply that this is how he'd write if he were writing a blog post or an op-ed or whatever) echoes the fear that underlies many of these discussions. He writes, "I don't care if I pay for children to be taught views I disagree with. But I do care if I pay for children to be indoctrinated in a particular religious tradition."
This switch from "taught" to "indoctrinated" reminds me of the old line about dirty pictures: "What I like is erotica. What you like is pornography. What they like is smut." Hence the title of this post.
Is "indoctrinating" children in a particular religious tradition different from/worse than "indoctrinating" them in a particular political or philosophical tradition (like the Afrocentrism I discussed in my column) or a particular interpretation of US history? How come? Do all religious schools "indoctrinate"? Do no non-religious schools indoctrinate? Do no public schools indoctrinate? (Am I asking "gimme" questions? :) )
This stuff becomes even harder when we're discussing colleges, since the students typically have much more choice in where they go (so "indoctrination" concerns should recede, I think) and the array of worldviews presented by the schools' professors tends to vary more. Georgetown, Notre Dame etc. offer scores of non-Catholic professors of philosophy and theology; Yale and that cold school with the weird Puritan mascot offer several deeply religious professors of ditto. As it happens, I don't think intra-university religious diversity should matter to this question--what should matter is whether the student could use the scholarship at schools of any religion or none--but it might matter to some people, so I mention it.
So yeah--the "myth of neutrality" that I discuss in that Jewish World Review column can't even be talked about until we agree on the nature of religious establishment, which so far, it seems like Jakala and I don't. I hope this has made my position at least a bit clearer.
ESTABLISHMENT CLAUS: That's what I'd do, if I were a bratty Christian and/or libertarian student who wanted to take the piss--set up some kind of Santa display in whatever passed for the local public square, and label him Establishment Claus. I'm anti-civic Deism, and anti-Santa Claus as generic symbol of the Winter Shopping Festival rather than actual Christian saint, so it would be fun to see the fireworks that would ensue. You could make Est. Claus more or less Christian depending on the reaction you wanted to provoke!
More on the actual establishment clause in a moment.
More on the actual establishment clause in a moment.
Wednesday, December 10, 2003
I COMPLAIN A LOT about Saint Matthew's Cathedral, my usual church. But Advent seems to have brought out the best in the 5:30 homilist (yes, I am that lazy), who I think is Msgr. Jameson--? The past two Sundays have brought us really good homilies.
The first Sunday of Advent we were reminded that Advent shouldn't just be a kind of seasonal costume parade, where we all pretend like Jesus is coming for the first time, make-believe. Advent should be an opportunity to relive the coming of Christ by opening our own hearts--our own lives--more deeply to Him. It should be a reminder that we have to relive Advent for real, not for show, all year; both reminder and practice, really. I liked this because it's way too easy to read the Catholic emphasis on liturgical seasons as a kind of costumery, rather than as a reflection of seasons of the heart and a way to practice responding to those seasons.
The second homily was on exile. I wish I remembered it better, since this is something of an obsession of mine--all Christians are exiles. Hence the insistent tone of the "Hail Holy Queen"; hence, too, the Christian identification (when we're doing what we should...) with the outcast. The homilist reminded us to live as exiles, and also to care for those, such as refugees, whose exile is temporal rather than existential in nature.
The first Sunday of Advent we were reminded that Advent shouldn't just be a kind of seasonal costume parade, where we all pretend like Jesus is coming for the first time, make-believe. Advent should be an opportunity to relive the coming of Christ by opening our own hearts--our own lives--more deeply to Him. It should be a reminder that we have to relive Advent for real, not for show, all year; both reminder and practice, really. I liked this because it's way too easy to read the Catholic emphasis on liturgical seasons as a kind of costumery, rather than as a reflection of seasons of the heart and a way to practice responding to those seasons.
The second homily was on exile. I wish I remembered it better, since this is something of an obsession of mine--all Christians are exiles. Hence the insistent tone of the "Hail Holy Queen"; hence, too, the Christian identification (when we're doing what we should...) with the outcast. The homilist reminded us to live as exiles, and also to care for those, such as refugees, whose exile is temporal rather than existential in nature.
COMICS LIKE WHAT YOU LIKE: I get a lot of people asking me, essentially, What's a nice girl like you doing in a semi-comics blog like this? This is because people generally think of comics (a medium) as superheroes (a genre--even a subgenre); see below for more on that. So I figured what I'd do is go through the really fun/powerful comics I own and tell you what they're like, and if they're like what you like, maybe you should check them out! Adding the visual storytelling really does change the shape of the stories in a way I find totally intriguing--if you like the ways movies differ from books, you probably will also like the ways comics differ from books.
So, in alphabetical order, and with no attempt to keep genres together:
Brian Bendis, Alias: "Sweet Smell of Success" meets the chick version of a Graham Greene antihero. The visual acuity of Lee Miller, the ferocious dialogue of "Gilda" run through a shredder. (Is that one of those meaningless critic-sentences? I hope not. What I mean is that the content of the dialogue is as furious as in the best noir, but the style is more realistic, less repartee-ish. Some people are distracted and irked by Bendis's attempts to mimic real speech patterns while making his dialogue much snappier than what real people say; I think it's the best of both worlds, and it definitely makes me more attentive to how people talk out here in real reality. Oh, reminding me! if you like Pat Cadigan's Mindplayers you have no excuse for not picking up Alias. Alias is better.)
Grant Morrison's Animal Man is like Jorge Borges goes to Disney World with Peter Singer. Crazy metafictional stuff, less symmetrical than Borges but, frankly, more fun. Fans of The Counterlife might also dig this. What you should do to know if you want to read it: a) read this column (which spoils significant bits of plot, but which does give you a great sense of why this comic is cool) or b) stand in a comics shop and read "The Coyote Gospel," from the first book.
Brian Bendis, Daredevil: "Sweet Smell of Success" maybe? Am I just saying that because I like both DD and "SSOS" a lot? Bendis in general has a real SSOS feel, and it's probably my favorite noir, so that's high praise.
Wendy and Richard Pini, ElfQuest books 1 through 4 (but not after): What's your favorite children's fantasy epic? Artistically better than the Alanna books, more blunt and contemporary (yes, despite the elves) than Lord of the Rings. Get this for a kid you know, then read it yourself before you wrap it. (Am I right in thinking they re-colored the new editions? Try to get the old ones, if so.)
Carla Speed McNeil, Finder: Sin-Eater 1 and 2: Samuel R. Delany, only with more vivid characters. I wish I had more to say about this, since if you like science fiction or want to read about gender or guilt this is a must-read.
Human Target: Final Cut: "The Usual Suspects," or "L.A. Confidential." Slick neo-noir-y-type-thing. Fun, not wildly meaningful, but fun. It has plot/theme points in common with both those movies.
Like a River: I can't think of anything this is "like," but it's a ramshackle Russian story of little lives, exploring the chasm between father and son. You know what it really reminds me of, sort of? Patti Smith's song "Birdland." And "Elegy." Both together.
Los Bros. Hernandez, Love and Rockets: Hard to describe this series, in part because it does everything it does about a million times better than anyone else attempting the same genres in different media. So... imagine if magical realism were good, instead of crap like it mostly is. Imagine if telenovelas grabbed your heart and squeezed, kept you on the edge of your seat with real psychological insight and real human drama rather than sentiment, cliched suspense, and melodrama. Imagine how you felt when you heard that first punk record, then the second one, and it was like a whole world of people insane the way you were just opened up. Then imagine if someone remembered that feeling and grew up anyway. Mix one shot "Cheap Tragedies" with two shots Flannery O'Connor and a jigger of Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, and shoot. Best place to start is maybe The Death of Speedy?
Alan Moore, A Small Killing: Brightness Falls in the hallucinatory style of Marc Chagall doing the design for "Jacob's Ladder," and with the attention to sexual corruption of "The Ice Storm." A small but harsh story.
Brian Bendis, Torso: If you like true crime and/or those newspaper noirs starring Edward G. Robinson, you will almost certainly like this. Next try Bendis's Jinx (better overall, more visually distinctive, but with a flaccid midsection and a short bit of most interest to superhero fans) or Goldfish (lowlife criminal/family drama).
EDITED TO ADD: Junji Ito, Uzumaki vol. 1 (I wasn't so into 2 and 3, but you might be): Eerie, haunting horror. Not "Misery" or even "Blair Witch"-style horror; much weirder than that. Very Japanese Magritte, with an assist from the titles and music of "Vertigo"??? The Hitchcock it feels most like is "The Birds."
Alan Moore, Watchmen: You know, I don't really know what to compare this to--which is a good sign. My advice is to check out some of the other stuff on this list, or on somebody else's comics list, and if you don't react weirdly just to the whole pictures plus words combination, read this. Does for superhero comics what Measure for Measure did for Elizabethan romantic comedy--does that help? Probably not. It's much more hopeful than M4M but has some of the same sense of drawing out the corruption underlying a genre. And just as you should read M4M even if you've never read Eliz. rom. com.s, in part because ERCs' sensibilities still shape our perceptions of romance, so you should read Watchmen even if you're not into superhero comics, in part because superhero comics' sensibilities--like it or not--still shape our perceptions of power.
So, in alphabetical order, and with no attempt to keep genres together:
Brian Bendis, Alias: "Sweet Smell of Success" meets the chick version of a Graham Greene antihero. The visual acuity of Lee Miller, the ferocious dialogue of "Gilda" run through a shredder. (Is that one of those meaningless critic-sentences? I hope not. What I mean is that the content of the dialogue is as furious as in the best noir, but the style is more realistic, less repartee-ish. Some people are distracted and irked by Bendis's attempts to mimic real speech patterns while making his dialogue much snappier than what real people say; I think it's the best of both worlds, and it definitely makes me more attentive to how people talk out here in real reality. Oh, reminding me! if you like Pat Cadigan's Mindplayers you have no excuse for not picking up Alias. Alias is better.)
Grant Morrison's Animal Man is like Jorge Borges goes to Disney World with Peter Singer. Crazy metafictional stuff, less symmetrical than Borges but, frankly, more fun. Fans of The Counterlife might also dig this. What you should do to know if you want to read it: a) read this column (which spoils significant bits of plot, but which does give you a great sense of why this comic is cool) or b) stand in a comics shop and read "The Coyote Gospel," from the first book.
Brian Bendis, Daredevil: "Sweet Smell of Success" maybe? Am I just saying that because I like both DD and "SSOS" a lot? Bendis in general has a real SSOS feel, and it's probably my favorite noir, so that's high praise.
Wendy and Richard Pini, ElfQuest books 1 through 4 (but not after): What's your favorite children's fantasy epic? Artistically better than the Alanna books, more blunt and contemporary (yes, despite the elves) than Lord of the Rings. Get this for a kid you know, then read it yourself before you wrap it. (Am I right in thinking they re-colored the new editions? Try to get the old ones, if so.)
Carla Speed McNeil, Finder: Sin-Eater 1 and 2: Samuel R. Delany, only with more vivid characters. I wish I had more to say about this, since if you like science fiction or want to read about gender or guilt this is a must-read.
Human Target: Final Cut: "The Usual Suspects," or "L.A. Confidential." Slick neo-noir-y-type-thing. Fun, not wildly meaningful, but fun. It has plot/theme points in common with both those movies.
Like a River: I can't think of anything this is "like," but it's a ramshackle Russian story of little lives, exploring the chasm between father and son. You know what it really reminds me of, sort of? Patti Smith's song "Birdland." And "Elegy." Both together.
Los Bros. Hernandez, Love and Rockets: Hard to describe this series, in part because it does everything it does about a million times better than anyone else attempting the same genres in different media. So... imagine if magical realism were good, instead of crap like it mostly is. Imagine if telenovelas grabbed your heart and squeezed, kept you on the edge of your seat with real psychological insight and real human drama rather than sentiment, cliched suspense, and melodrama. Imagine how you felt when you heard that first punk record, then the second one, and it was like a whole world of people insane the way you were just opened up. Then imagine if someone remembered that feeling and grew up anyway. Mix one shot "Cheap Tragedies" with two shots Flannery O'Connor and a jigger of Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, and shoot. Best place to start is maybe The Death of Speedy?
Alan Moore, A Small Killing: Brightness Falls in the hallucinatory style of Marc Chagall doing the design for "Jacob's Ladder," and with the attention to sexual corruption of "The Ice Storm." A small but harsh story.
Brian Bendis, Torso: If you like true crime and/or those newspaper noirs starring Edward G. Robinson, you will almost certainly like this. Next try Bendis's Jinx (better overall, more visually distinctive, but with a flaccid midsection and a short bit of most interest to superhero fans) or Goldfish (lowlife criminal/family drama).
EDITED TO ADD: Junji Ito, Uzumaki vol. 1 (I wasn't so into 2 and 3, but you might be): Eerie, haunting horror. Not "Misery" or even "Blair Witch"-style horror; much weirder than that. Very Japanese Magritte, with an assist from the titles and music of "Vertigo"??? The Hitchcock it feels most like is "The Birds."
Alan Moore, Watchmen: You know, I don't really know what to compare this to--which is a good sign. My advice is to check out some of the other stuff on this list, or on somebody else's comics list, and if you don't react weirdly just to the whole pictures plus words combination, read this. Does for superhero comics what Measure for Measure did for Elizabethan romantic comedy--does that help? Probably not. It's much more hopeful than M4M but has some of the same sense of drawing out the corruption underlying a genre. And just as you should read M4M even if you've never read Eliz. rom. com.s, in part because ERCs' sensibilities still shape our perceptions of romance, so you should read Watchmen even if you're not into superhero comics, in part because superhero comics' sensibilities--like it or not--still shape our perceptions of power.
ORIGIN STORIES: How do people get into comics? That's the question that was on my mind after reading Journalista!'s rant/essay about (what he views as) the rotten state of the industry.
Because ultimately, that's what I think J! is calling for--more people with more kinds of tastes shaping the industry. And when I think about it that way, Dirk's pessimism or somewhat desperate edge seems pretty persuasive to me, even though I agree with Sean Collins (if it was him?) that hosts of awesome comics are coming out right now.
The first problem here is that people think comics are something you need to "be into." It's weird to go to comic shops and browse, and cart comic books around and read them on the bus and in the coffeeshop line, in a way that it's not weird at all to check out the latest movie reviews or browse the new releases at Borders. The medium is associated with a genre, and a genre that gets significantly less respect than it deserves. I'd say the best superhero comics are better than the best mysteries, for example, but get a lot less respect than The Long Goodbye, and even less respect than Agatha Christie (who herself is held in undeserved contempt).
I'm pretty sure that's why, even though I'd read comics all my life, I never thought of reading comics as a thing I do. I read ElfQuest as a kid, and loved it. I'd stay up after my bedtime re-reading ElfQuest by the light from the streetlamps streaming in through my window. (Mom, if you're reading this, please don't kill me!) I think I read Maus in junior high, or maybe early high school? In high school I got into Love and Rockets. But all this time I never even considered figuring out whether there were other comics out there that I might like. When I started getting into movies, or punk music, I just assumed that I would find all kinds of cool stuff out there if I looked; but I didn't even think of the comics I loved as comics. They were just... you know, ElfQuest and Maus and L&R. Oh and Ernie Pook's Comeek. Sui generis, and not really sharing a medium. (Admittedly, EPC really is pretty different from the other three, but still, sequential art and all that.) I'd be interested to find out whether this is how most people who read Persepolis, say, think about it. If it is how they think, Persepolis's popularity won't spill out onto other really good comics.
In the summer of 2000, I needed a quick, "intellectual coating over a candy center"-type article for my college's right-wing monthly. Figured I'd go see the most intriguing of the summer's blockbuster pix, "X-Men." Had fun; wrote a piece about the implications of genetic engineering for that Glenn Loury tagline about how conservatism is "the belief that human nature has no history." Forgot about it.
This past summer, the "X2" hype started, along with the "Matrix: Reloaded" (bleah) hype. It's more fun to be excited about two movies than one, so I figured, what the hey, I liked the first one; I'll see the second.
I didn't like it. Or so I thought. But something about it nagged at me, and I ended up seeing it several times. I think the main attractions were a) I never see new big-budget action pictures, because most of them are guaranteed crapathons, so "X2" is one of my only exposures to all those spectacular SFX and sleek designs; and b) the acting is really excellent. Nobody gets enough to do, but they (almost) all make their mark. Famke Janssen has this one thing she does with her hand, twice in the movie, that's just perfect.
Anyway, for whatever reason, I was interested. Started reading other people's reviews of the movie. This led to descriptions of various X-Men comics. Some of them sounded good. Hmm, I thought. Wonder if I'd like any of these. It was around this time that I started having bad insomnia, so I'd stay up late reading review sites and trying to get together a list of comics that sounded cool, basically in order to kill time. Ended up getting some okay stuff (X-Force; eh) and some stuff I still think is really good (New X-Men). The report is here.
I asked for recommendations, got 'em, and spent lots more up-all-night hours trawling review sites. Read the first Alias book and was just blown away. Started trying to figure out what I liked about it.
I think some of it is that I'm naturally oriented much more toward words than toward pictures. Even in discussing painting or photography, it's easier for me to pick up on the symbolism of the objects or poses in the work than on the composition elements and the way they advance the picture's meaning. I love comics because, like movies, they have enough "words" (dialogue, but also characters and plots) to make the work the composition does obvious to me. So they make me think visually, basically opening up a whole new way of approaching art. I can walk away from a comic, as with a movie, looking at the whole world differently. I love Alias in large part because every inch of every page advances the point of the comic--nothing's wasted. It's tight. And so when I ask myself, "OK, why did this page have such a big impact on me?", I learn how to think visually. Comics stretch my abilities to read, intuit, and convey meaning--while also, like any medium, providing everything from dumb fun (Ultimate X-Men) to genuinely powerful art (A Small Killing).
So now I think of reading comics as a Thing I Do. I browse comic shops. I read lots of different kinds of comics, comics that have nothing in common except medium, but now I notice the medium, whereas when I was reading ElfQuest and the rest I didn't even know there was a medium to notice.
I think this comes back, again, to the medium-is-viewed-as-a-genre problem: I didn't notice comics as a medium until I was interested in superheroes as a genre. That's an amazingly bassackward way to approach any medium. No wonder the industry has problems!
On a superficial level, I'm exactly the comics reader that DC and Marvel are currently trying to produce, no? I saw one of their big-budget movies and now I read lotsa comics. But in actuality, right-wing movie review + desire to see a popular movie for once in my life + genuinely good movie + insomnia + obsessive Internet usage + blog (thanks esp. to Unqualified Offerings!) + really good advice from one particular comics clerk (at Beyond Comics, which, unfortunately, isn't the better of the two DC stores, but which has superfriendly and helpful clerks) = an origin story more convoluted than the one from the Hulk movie. This is not a chain of events to be counted on!
More on separating medium and genre in the next post.
Because ultimately, that's what I think J! is calling for--more people with more kinds of tastes shaping the industry. And when I think about it that way, Dirk's pessimism or somewhat desperate edge seems pretty persuasive to me, even though I agree with Sean Collins (if it was him?) that hosts of awesome comics are coming out right now.
The first problem here is that people think comics are something you need to "be into." It's weird to go to comic shops and browse, and cart comic books around and read them on the bus and in the coffeeshop line, in a way that it's not weird at all to check out the latest movie reviews or browse the new releases at Borders. The medium is associated with a genre, and a genre that gets significantly less respect than it deserves. I'd say the best superhero comics are better than the best mysteries, for example, but get a lot less respect than The Long Goodbye, and even less respect than Agatha Christie (who herself is held in undeserved contempt).
I'm pretty sure that's why, even though I'd read comics all my life, I never thought of reading comics as a thing I do. I read ElfQuest as a kid, and loved it. I'd stay up after my bedtime re-reading ElfQuest by the light from the streetlamps streaming in through my window. (Mom, if you're reading this, please don't kill me!) I think I read Maus in junior high, or maybe early high school? In high school I got into Love and Rockets. But all this time I never even considered figuring out whether there were other comics out there that I might like. When I started getting into movies, or punk music, I just assumed that I would find all kinds of cool stuff out there if I looked; but I didn't even think of the comics I loved as comics. They were just... you know, ElfQuest and Maus and L&R. Oh and Ernie Pook's Comeek. Sui generis, and not really sharing a medium. (Admittedly, EPC really is pretty different from the other three, but still, sequential art and all that.) I'd be interested to find out whether this is how most people who read Persepolis, say, think about it. If it is how they think, Persepolis's popularity won't spill out onto other really good comics.
In the summer of 2000, I needed a quick, "intellectual coating over a candy center"-type article for my college's right-wing monthly. Figured I'd go see the most intriguing of the summer's blockbuster pix, "X-Men." Had fun; wrote a piece about the implications of genetic engineering for that Glenn Loury tagline about how conservatism is "the belief that human nature has no history." Forgot about it.
This past summer, the "X2" hype started, along with the "Matrix: Reloaded" (bleah) hype. It's more fun to be excited about two movies than one, so I figured, what the hey, I liked the first one; I'll see the second.
I didn't like it. Or so I thought. But something about it nagged at me, and I ended up seeing it several times. I think the main attractions were a) I never see new big-budget action pictures, because most of them are guaranteed crapathons, so "X2" is one of my only exposures to all those spectacular SFX and sleek designs; and b) the acting is really excellent. Nobody gets enough to do, but they (almost) all make their mark. Famke Janssen has this one thing she does with her hand, twice in the movie, that's just perfect.
Anyway, for whatever reason, I was interested. Started reading other people's reviews of the movie. This led to descriptions of various X-Men comics. Some of them sounded good. Hmm, I thought. Wonder if I'd like any of these. It was around this time that I started having bad insomnia, so I'd stay up late reading review sites and trying to get together a list of comics that sounded cool, basically in order to kill time. Ended up getting some okay stuff (X-Force; eh) and some stuff I still think is really good (New X-Men). The report is here.
I asked for recommendations, got 'em, and spent lots more up-all-night hours trawling review sites. Read the first Alias book and was just blown away. Started trying to figure out what I liked about it.
I think some of it is that I'm naturally oriented much more toward words than toward pictures. Even in discussing painting or photography, it's easier for me to pick up on the symbolism of the objects or poses in the work than on the composition elements and the way they advance the picture's meaning. I love comics because, like movies, they have enough "words" (dialogue, but also characters and plots) to make the work the composition does obvious to me. So they make me think visually, basically opening up a whole new way of approaching art. I can walk away from a comic, as with a movie, looking at the whole world differently. I love Alias in large part because every inch of every page advances the point of the comic--nothing's wasted. It's tight. And so when I ask myself, "OK, why did this page have such a big impact on me?", I learn how to think visually. Comics stretch my abilities to read, intuit, and convey meaning--while also, like any medium, providing everything from dumb fun (Ultimate X-Men) to genuinely powerful art (A Small Killing).
So now I think of reading comics as a Thing I Do. I browse comic shops. I read lots of different kinds of comics, comics that have nothing in common except medium, but now I notice the medium, whereas when I was reading ElfQuest and the rest I didn't even know there was a medium to notice.
I think this comes back, again, to the medium-is-viewed-as-a-genre problem: I didn't notice comics as a medium until I was interested in superheroes as a genre. That's an amazingly bassackward way to approach any medium. No wonder the industry has problems!
On a superficial level, I'm exactly the comics reader that DC and Marvel are currently trying to produce, no? I saw one of their big-budget movies and now I read lotsa comics. But in actuality, right-wing movie review + desire to see a popular movie for once in my life + genuinely good movie + insomnia + obsessive Internet usage + blog (thanks esp. to Unqualified Offerings!) + really good advice from one particular comics clerk (at Beyond Comics, which, unfortunately, isn't the better of the two DC stores, but which has superfriendly and helpful clerks) = an origin story more convoluted than the one from the Hulk movie. This is not a chain of events to be counted on!
More on separating medium and genre in the next post.
THAT'S THE WAY THE KAISER BLOGROLLS: Adding Deeds (working for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq), Iraq the Model, Letter from Gotham, The Rat. Subtracting somewhat randomly.
THE PINUP REMAINS EVER AFTER IMMORTAL AS ALL AROUND DIES: Fascinating Slate review of Martin Amis's new book, Yellow Dog:
...These plot lines are all set rolling by the same tragic flaw: the unsustainability of sexual equilibrium for your average male. ...
It is Amis' point that with the digital proliferation (and the widening cultural acceptance) of pornography, sexual equilibrium has become even more elusive. ...
[quoting Yellow Dog:] He knew that the distance between himself and the world of women was getting greater. Each night, as he entered the Borgesian metropolis of electronic pornography--with its infinities, its immortalities--Clint was, in a sense, travelling towards women. But he was also travelling away from them.
As readers of Time's Arrow will remember, Amis is at his most brilliant when exploiting paradoxes like these, those moments when life seems to make as much sense if it's run backward or turned inside out. ...
...Yellow Dog is likely to be least endurable to those most sympathetic to Amis' anguish. Since, in the world Amis creates, casual exposure to pornographic images puts people on a steep and slippery slope, one wonders what he thinks he's doing in forcing such imagery on the reader. Amis' subject matter so raises the stakes that this must be either a moral book or a dirty one. It winds up being both. The book is the equivalent of one of those partial-birth-abortion posters waved around at political conventions. It unleashes more than most intelligent readers can be expected to assimilate--and certainly more than any self-respecting reader should be asked to endure.
more?
...These plot lines are all set rolling by the same tragic flaw: the unsustainability of sexual equilibrium for your average male. ...
It is Amis' point that with the digital proliferation (and the widening cultural acceptance) of pornography, sexual equilibrium has become even more elusive. ...
[quoting Yellow Dog:] He knew that the distance between himself and the world of women was getting greater. Each night, as he entered the Borgesian metropolis of electronic pornography--with its infinities, its immortalities--Clint was, in a sense, travelling towards women. But he was also travelling away from them.
As readers of Time's Arrow will remember, Amis is at his most brilliant when exploiting paradoxes like these, those moments when life seems to make as much sense if it's run backward or turned inside out. ...
...Yellow Dog is likely to be least endurable to those most sympathetic to Amis' anguish. Since, in the world Amis creates, casual exposure to pornographic images puts people on a steep and slippery slope, one wonders what he thinks he's doing in forcing such imagery on the reader. Amis' subject matter so raises the stakes that this must be either a moral book or a dirty one. It winds up being both. The book is the equivalent of one of those partial-birth-abortion posters waved around at political conventions. It unleashes more than most intelligent readers can be expected to assimilate--and certainly more than any self-respecting reader should be asked to endure.
more?
Soon I felt a blogwatch form
Somewhere below my skin...
The Agitator: Can the government force you to advertise for your industry? Right now, yes. The Institute for Justice (cue trumpets) is trying to change that.
Amy Welborn: "Anyway, if you were going to explain the Immaculate Conception to someone who didn't understand it, what would you say?" Lots of good stuff in the comments. More here--and again, check out the comments. Also, take a quiz!
Camassia has quite a bit of interesting stuff: Presents are Christian too!; why does the scapegoat escape?; the Harrowing of Hell.
And: Fixing San Francisco's homelessness crisis. NYC and Philadelphia as models. Via Sursum Corda.
Somewhere below my skin...
The Agitator: Can the government force you to advertise for your industry? Right now, yes. The Institute for Justice (cue trumpets) is trying to change that.
Amy Welborn: "Anyway, if you were going to explain the Immaculate Conception to someone who didn't understand it, what would you say?" Lots of good stuff in the comments. More here--and again, check out the comments. Also, take a quiz!
Camassia has quite a bit of interesting stuff: Presents are Christian too!; why does the scapegoat escape?; the Harrowing of Hell.
And: Fixing San Francisco's homelessness crisis. NYC and Philadelphia as models. Via Sursum Corda.
Monday, December 08, 2003
DEFINING TERRORISM DOWN: Must-read piece from the Denver Post on how the Bush administration is fudging the terror-conviction numbers. Excerpts follow:
In the two years following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the federal government has dramatically increased the prosecution of crimes it says are related to domestic or foreign terrorism, and more than tripled its rate of convictions for those offenses compared with the two years before the attacks.
But the median sentence for those convicted of international terrorism during that time is just 14 days, while some convictions the government has labeled as related to counterterrorism resulted in a sentence of community service or drug rehabilitation, according to government data to be released by a private research group today. ...
[Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse] data shows that convictions in cases the Justice Department says are related to international terrorism jumped 7 1/2 times compared with the two years before the attacks--from 24 to 184--but the number of individuals who received sentences of five or more years actually dropped, from six in the two years before the attacks to three in the two years that followed. ...
In what authorities describe as a strategy of prevention, potential or suspected terrorists are being charged since the 2001 attacks with minor nonterrorism crimes to get them off the street or out of the country. ...
In a prominent case in Denver, for example, three men who allegedly attended an al-Qaeda training camp were charged with an immigration offense--lying on a visa application. Although the men are not being prosecuted for terrorism, the FBI considers it a terrorism-related case.
But that discretion has also led to a terrorism classification for crimes that have no apparent terrorist link....
more
Via Hit & Run.
In the two years following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the federal government has dramatically increased the prosecution of crimes it says are related to domestic or foreign terrorism, and more than tripled its rate of convictions for those offenses compared with the two years before the attacks.
But the median sentence for those convicted of international terrorism during that time is just 14 days, while some convictions the government has labeled as related to counterterrorism resulted in a sentence of community service or drug rehabilitation, according to government data to be released by a private research group today. ...
[Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse] data shows that convictions in cases the Justice Department says are related to international terrorism jumped 7 1/2 times compared with the two years before the attacks--from 24 to 184--but the number of individuals who received sentences of five or more years actually dropped, from six in the two years before the attacks to three in the two years that followed. ...
In what authorities describe as a strategy of prevention, potential or suspected terrorists are being charged since the 2001 attacks with minor nonterrorism crimes to get them off the street or out of the country. ...
In a prominent case in Denver, for example, three men who allegedly attended an al-Qaeda training camp were charged with an immigration offense--lying on a visa application. Although the men are not being prosecuted for terrorism, the FBI considers it a terrorism-related case.
But that discretion has also led to a terrorism classification for crimes that have no apparent terrorist link....
more
Via Hit & Run.
BOYCOTT PLANNED PARENTHOOD--the website of the Austin, TX campaign to organize construction contractors to refuse to help build a Planned Parenthood clinic there. Includes links to other sites that will help you organize a similar boycott in your town. If you're pro-life and you work in the building trades or know pro-lifers who do, check this site out.
Via E-Pression.
Via E-Pression.
THE CAPITOL HILL PREGNANCY CENTER REALLY NEEDS YOUR MONEY. This great, great pregnancy center, where I volunteer once a week, is going through financial difficulties. The center sees about 1500 clients a year, mostly from DC; it offers parenting classes, post-abortion counseling, maternity clothes, and childcare products (kids' clothes, diapers, bottles, baby powder, formula, toys, books... etc.), as well as, of course, free pregnancy tests and counseling for women who think they might be pregnant. Please consider giving them money this year. You can call them at (202) 546-1018 or send a check to
713 Maryland Ave. NE
Washington DC 20002.
THANKS.
713 Maryland Ave. NE
Washington DC 20002.
THANKS.
Ask not what you can do for your blogwatch;
What's your blogwatch been doing to you?...
The Agitator: Frogs made out of pork. For the bulging "Politicians Are Insane" file.
Journalista!: Ranty column on what's wrong with the comics industry. I have some rambly personal stuff to say about this later, but for now I'll just say that the first half of the essay really interested me because it details the emergence and collapse of a monopoly in the absence of government manipulation of the market. Really nice econ case study, I should think.
Krubner: Why can't conservatives get the courts they want? (good question); and he comments on a good piece by Virginia Postrel, about "relationship capitalism" (basically, the small-town model) and how it holds people and countries back.
Mark Shea: Recommend children's books! I've already linked to my Crisis magazine piece on the subject ("Outside Narnia: Christianity and children's fantasy," about how the non-Christian fantasy books I read as a kid influenced my conversion) in his comments box.
Noli Irritare Leones: Several helpful and informative links on the Terri Schiavo case and its repercussions; excellent post on men, women, and divorce, in which Lynn smacks some very silly things said by Wendy McElroy. Marriage-movement-type people should definitely check that post out.
Tushnet: Yes, my sister also blogs. Intellectual-property law, copyright, trademark, and assorted whatnot, plus sense of humor. Click now and beat the rush!
Unqualified Offerings: Lots of posts about cover songs (here's an old list from me and here's one from Kesher Talk); good, basic, growly "where are the WMDs?" post taking down stuff said by a former Iraqi lt. col.
What's your blogwatch been doing to you?...
The Agitator: Frogs made out of pork. For the bulging "Politicians Are Insane" file.
Journalista!: Ranty column on what's wrong with the comics industry. I have some rambly personal stuff to say about this later, but for now I'll just say that the first half of the essay really interested me because it details the emergence and collapse of a monopoly in the absence of government manipulation of the market. Really nice econ case study, I should think.
Krubner: Why can't conservatives get the courts they want? (good question); and he comments on a good piece by Virginia Postrel, about "relationship capitalism" (basically, the small-town model) and how it holds people and countries back.
Mark Shea: Recommend children's books! I've already linked to my Crisis magazine piece on the subject ("Outside Narnia: Christianity and children's fantasy," about how the non-Christian fantasy books I read as a kid influenced my conversion) in his comments box.
Noli Irritare Leones: Several helpful and informative links on the Terri Schiavo case and its repercussions; excellent post on men, women, and divorce, in which Lynn smacks some very silly things said by Wendy McElroy. Marriage-movement-type people should definitely check that post out.
Tushnet: Yes, my sister also blogs. Intellectual-property law, copyright, trademark, and assorted whatnot, plus sense of humor. Click now and beat the rush!
Unqualified Offerings: Lots of posts about cover songs (here's an old list from me and here's one from Kesher Talk); good, basic, growly "where are the WMDs?" post taking down stuff said by a former Iraqi lt. col.
Thursday, December 04, 2003
Wednesday, December 03, 2003
HYMN WEDNESDAY: Instead of poetry, one of my favorite hymns, for Advent.
Let all mortal flesh keep silence
And with fear and trembling stand;
Ponder nothing earthly minded,
For with blessing in his hand
Christ our God to earth descendeth,
Our full homage to demand.
King of kings, yet born of Mary,
As of old on earth He stood,
Lord of lord in human vesture,
In the body and the blood.
He will give to all the faithful
His own self for heavenly food.
Rank on rank the host of heaven
Spreads its vanguard on the way,
As the Light of light descendeth
From the realms of endless day,
That the powers of hell may vanish
As the darkness clears away.
At His feet the six-winged seraph;
Cherubim, with sleepless eye,
Veil their faces to the Presence,
As with ceaseless voice they cry,
Alleluia, Alleluia,
Alleluia, Lord most high.
Let all mortal flesh keep silence
And with fear and trembling stand;
Ponder nothing earthly minded,
For with blessing in his hand
Christ our God to earth descendeth,
Our full homage to demand.
King of kings, yet born of Mary,
As of old on earth He stood,
Lord of lord in human vesture,
In the body and the blood.
He will give to all the faithful
His own self for heavenly food.
Rank on rank the host of heaven
Spreads its vanguard on the way,
As the Light of light descendeth
From the realms of endless day,
That the powers of hell may vanish
As the darkness clears away.
At His feet the six-winged seraph;
Cherubim, with sleepless eye,
Veil their faces to the Presence,
As with ceaseless voice they cry,
Alleluia, Alleluia,
Alleluia, Lord most high.
HODER FOR IRAN. "Welcome to Iran, where, based on the latest election regulations, no one can stand for parliament elections unless he or she acknowledges the Islamic regime, the rule of Islam (one must be a practicing Muslim), and the concept of unlimited power of its supreme leader (or simply Wilayat Faqih). ...
"Now imagine when people couldn't express what they really want, they would come out and say it publicly. In other words, suppose that thousands of Iranian announce their symbolic candidacy for the parliament elections, as I already did, and publicly show what they think their plans would be, no matter they'd be accepted as a qualified candidate or not.
"So before I start to talk about my own agenda, a few friends and I have decided to build a website in which everyone can easily make a webpage including his or her name, picture, biography and their agenda. ...
"This way, we can show the world that how different is our expectations and plans from those of Reformists who think are representing the majority of people."
more
sort of via InstaPundit
"Now imagine when people couldn't express what they really want, they would come out and say it publicly. In other words, suppose that thousands of Iranian announce their symbolic candidacy for the parliament elections, as I already did, and publicly show what they think their plans would be, no matter they'd be accepted as a qualified candidate or not.
"So before I start to talk about my own agenda, a few friends and I have decided to build a website in which everyone can easily make a webpage including his or her name, picture, biography and their agenda. ...
"This way, we can show the world that how different is our expectations and plans from those of Reformists who think are representing the majority of people."
more
sort of via InstaPundit
I'LL COME SPEAK: Do you attend or work at a Catholic university? Would you be interested in hearing me speak on same-sex marriage? (Pretty much any aspect thereof.) If so, please get in touch with me at eve_tushnet@yahoo.com. Thanks!
(Here's a roundup of a bunch of stuff I've written on SSM.)
(Here's a roundup of a bunch of stuff I've written on SSM.)
Is this the sweet sound
that calls the young blogwatch?
The voice might be one and the same...
BlogAfrica: Tons of African blogs. Via InstaPundit.
Dappled Things: St. Aelred, intense male friendship, and homosexuality: "Gerard posts this letter from the Abbot of the Trappist Monastery of the Genesee on the question of St Aelred of Rievaulx and homosexuality, recently mentioned by Andrew Sullivan in the context of same-sex love.
"The passages that are often pointed to by gay activists (one of which is quoted by Sullivan) are of the sort that would tend to make 'red-blooded American males' squirm. They may well be homosexual in origin, or they may simply be intense expressions of same-sex affection coming from a heterosexual, as the Abbot of the Genesee points out is not uncommon in some other cultures. ...What IS, however, clear is that they are not statements in favor of gay sex. Let heterosexuals, then, read them as affirmations of same-sex affection, spiritual friendship, and the need to step away from overly-rigid judgments about what is and isn't manly. Let homosexuals read them as affirmations of the dignity of all people, the need for chaste love in Christ, and the importance of sound and true friendship for flourishing in life."
more
and Sed Contra comments here.
Oxblog: More on the Federalist Papers in Arabic.
The Rat: She's back! (I guess finals week brings out the blogger in her.) Lots of crazy stuff: Cellini's mad castellan, the memoir game, Marilyn Monroe, and, of course, narrativity.
"Rush Limbaugh in the Confessional."
that calls the young blogwatch?
The voice might be one and the same...
BlogAfrica: Tons of African blogs. Via InstaPundit.
Dappled Things: St. Aelred, intense male friendship, and homosexuality: "Gerard posts this letter from the Abbot of the Trappist Monastery of the Genesee on the question of St Aelred of Rievaulx and homosexuality, recently mentioned by Andrew Sullivan in the context of same-sex love.
"The passages that are often pointed to by gay activists (one of which is quoted by Sullivan) are of the sort that would tend to make 'red-blooded American males' squirm. They may well be homosexual in origin, or they may simply be intense expressions of same-sex affection coming from a heterosexual, as the Abbot of the Genesee points out is not uncommon in some other cultures. ...What IS, however, clear is that they are not statements in favor of gay sex. Let heterosexuals, then, read them as affirmations of same-sex affection, spiritual friendship, and the need to step away from overly-rigid judgments about what is and isn't manly. Let homosexuals read them as affirmations of the dignity of all people, the need for chaste love in Christ, and the importance of sound and true friendship for flourishing in life."
more
and Sed Contra comments here.
Oxblog: More on the Federalist Papers in Arabic.
The Rat: She's back! (I guess finals week brings out the blogger in her.) Lots of crazy stuff: Cellini's mad castellan, the memoir game, Marilyn Monroe, and, of course, narrativity.
"Rush Limbaugh in the Confessional."
GAY IS THE NEW BLACK: That's what we're discussing on MarriageDebate--the frequent comparison between interracial marriage and same-sex marriage. Come join us.
"JESUS IN DISTRESSING DISGUISE": That's how Mother Teresa described the poor she served. But it's also a key to understanding the Catholic mind. So much of how we live is about what Aquinas's great hymn, "Pange Lingua," captured in the phrase "sensuum defectui"--in my super-rough quasi-translation, "what the senses cannot [do]."
Mark ch. 6 describes how the people of Jesus's own hometown did not recognize their Savior. It's maybe too easy to feel superior to these people--how could they not recognize Jesus? But it is so hard, really, to know ourselves, let alone other people--we are constantly confronted with Jesus in distressing disguise, and we constantly fail to see Him.
Most obviously for Catholics, there's the Eucharist, the Body and Blood of the Lord. (I suppose the Eucharistic miracles are the equivalent of the Transfiguration, when the divinity behind the deceptive, plain human skin was revealed.)
Then there's Jesus hidden in those in need.
Then there's Jesus hidden in those we have wronged. Azar Nafisi's Reading Lolita in Tehran includes the acute line, "Of course, all murderers and all oppressors have a long list of grievances against their victims, only most are not as eloquent as Humbert Humbert." It is so painful to acknowledge the reality of the people we harm.
Then there's Jesus hidden in the people who annoy us.
Then there's Jesus in the people who embarrass us.
Really, there are so many unseen Christs--we overlook Him every day.
My cheery Advent thought, I guess.
How to go to Confession. (I believe in always ending a blog post with a practical tip, a la Hints from Heloise.)
Mark ch. 6 describes how the people of Jesus's own hometown did not recognize their Savior. It's maybe too easy to feel superior to these people--how could they not recognize Jesus? But it is so hard, really, to know ourselves, let alone other people--we are constantly confronted with Jesus in distressing disguise, and we constantly fail to see Him.
Most obviously for Catholics, there's the Eucharist, the Body and Blood of the Lord. (I suppose the Eucharistic miracles are the equivalent of the Transfiguration, when the divinity behind the deceptive, plain human skin was revealed.)
Then there's Jesus hidden in those in need.
Then there's Jesus hidden in those we have wronged. Azar Nafisi's Reading Lolita in Tehran includes the acute line, "Of course, all murderers and all oppressors have a long list of grievances against their victims, only most are not as eloquent as Humbert Humbert." It is so painful to acknowledge the reality of the people we harm.
Then there's Jesus hidden in the people who annoy us.
Then there's Jesus in the people who embarrass us.
Really, there are so many unseen Christs--we overlook Him every day.
My cheery Advent thought, I guess.
How to go to Confession. (I believe in always ending a blog post with a practical tip, a la Hints from Heloise.)
REAL LIFE IS SO UNREALISTIC, DON'T YOU THINK?: I was reading my old post about "The Bride of Frankenstein," and came across my appreciative citation of this line from an otherwise unsatisfying piece from Bright Lights Film Journal: "...a genre effort like 'Bride,' full of fantasy and monster-outsiders, was clearly the perfect medium for indulging the most radical aspects of a gay sensibility..."
At the time, I didn't elaborate on that, and I don't know that I understood it especially well. Rereading my post, I wondered why it struck me so much. Here's why: Anyone who is or feels herself radically opposed to the currents of the day is liable to feel that her own account of her life is "unrealistic." Her perspective is not realist. Her perspective is fantastic, outside, genre.
"Realism" only works for people whose worldviews are already accepted as realistic. The rest of us must make do with genre.
I expect that's why I sense no appreciable difference between my "realist" (augh! are my archives fixed yet???), sci-fi, and surrealist short stories.
At the time, I didn't elaborate on that, and I don't know that I understood it especially well. Rereading my post, I wondered why it struck me so much. Here's why: Anyone who is or feels herself radically opposed to the currents of the day is liable to feel that her own account of her life is "unrealistic." Her perspective is not realist. Her perspective is fantastic, outside, genre.
"Realism" only works for people whose worldviews are already accepted as realistic. The rest of us must make do with genre.
I expect that's why I sense no appreciable difference between my "realist" (augh! are my archives fixed yet???), sci-fi, and surrealist short stories.
RICH AND STRANGE: My review of Amy Chua's World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability.
NOT MY THING, but I imagine many of my readers would be interested to know that Sean Collins is blogging as he reads through the Lord of the Rings trilogy. First installment here.
(I love the birthday party, and the slow menace of the very beginning of The Fellowship of the Ring, but I can't make myself reread the books now. Not that you need to care.)
(I love the birthday party, and the slow menace of the very beginning of The Fellowship of the Ring, but I can't make myself reread the books now. Not that you need to care.)
ACTONE 2004!: "Nearing its sixth year and with more than 200 of its graduates now striving to move up through the entertainment ranks, ACT ONE: WRITING FOR HOLLYWOOD announces that it is once again accepting applications for two four-week training sessions in 2004-one at its campus in Hollywood, and the other within view of the Washington Monument in Washington, D.C. Application deadline is March 1, 2004.
and July 5 in Hollywood. ...
"An inter-denominational training program for aspiring scriptwriters from the Christian community, ACT ONE's faculty consists of more than 50 working professionals in the entertainment industry (especially writers, directors and producers) who lead students through an intensive hands-on curriculum in the theories and practices of film and TV writing (the specialized TV track requires extra work in addition to the basic curriculum). ACT ONE Director Barbara Nicolosi notes that the goal of ACT ONE is not to produce 'religious' scripts, but rather scripts that reflect a Christian worldview. ...
"Since ACT ONE will only accept 30 students into each summer program, the application process is quite competitive. But as screenwriter and faculty member Janet Batchler notes: 'ACT ONE is by far the most-thorough, most-inspiring, most-intensive screenwriting program I've seen anywhere. You can waste years of time tiptoeing around the edges of the entertainment industry, or you can come to ACT ONE and learn what you need to know in four weeks.'"
more info here
and July 5 in Hollywood. ...
"An inter-denominational training program for aspiring scriptwriters from the Christian community, ACT ONE's faculty consists of more than 50 working professionals in the entertainment industry (especially writers, directors and producers) who lead students through an intensive hands-on curriculum in the theories and practices of film and TV writing (the specialized TV track requires extra work in addition to the basic curriculum). ACT ONE Director Barbara Nicolosi notes that the goal of ACT ONE is not to produce 'religious' scripts, but rather scripts that reflect a Christian worldview. ...
"Since ACT ONE will only accept 30 students into each summer program, the application process is quite competitive. But as screenwriter and faculty member Janet Batchler notes: 'ACT ONE is by far the most-thorough, most-inspiring, most-intensive screenwriting program I've seen anywhere. You can waste years of time tiptoeing around the edges of the entertainment industry, or you can come to ACT ONE and learn what you need to know in four weeks.'"
more info here
"DESIRE: REAL MASK": Part three of my current short story has been posted. You can get the whole story-so-far here; or just the most recent (fall) episode here.
This episode is mostly about Holly, Laila, and Suha in high school, but also includes this little flashback: "Since early childhood I'd created these utterly obscure, private costume ideas--when I was ten I was 'the ghost of a wolf,' which was not even the most bizarre. I would ring the doorbells, waiting, secretly wishing that behind the cotton-cobwebbed doors I would find someone who would guess what I was. This, of course, never happened."
This episode is mostly about Holly, Laila, and Suha in high school, but also includes this little flashback: "Since early childhood I'd created these utterly obscure, private costume ideas--when I was ten I was 'the ghost of a wolf,' which was not even the most bizarre. I would ring the doorbells, waiting, secretly wishing that behind the cotton-cobwebbed doors I would find someone who would guess what I was. This, of course, never happened."
Tuesday, December 02, 2003
DISAPPOINTMENT IN SAMARRA?: Unqualified Offerings looks at the very weird math behind reports of a major US victory in Iraq. Scroll down for more.
UPDATED: Tons more stuff. Just go here and scroll.
UPDATED: Tons more stuff. Just go here and scroll.
THE STRAIGHT DOPE TAKES ON ETHANOL SUBSIDIES: "Money-wasting government schemes are hardly rare. But how many do you know of that flout the second law of thermodynamics?"
more
more
Monday, December 01, 2003
WHEN SISTERHOOD WAS IN FLOWER: I just finished reading this truly hilarious satire of '70s feminism, by failed Southern lady Florence King. Although I initially feared that the satire would be too broad to be scathing, King soon had me hooting and gasping with laughter and recognition.
Best stuff: The humor flows naturally from the characters (especially Gloria, the drugged-up medievalist with an Edward II fixation and a witchy curling iron). You never feel like King is yanking the plot or the characters around in order to make a point.
The right-winger is a slutty, cynical lush who coos to her pets ("Him have new name-names!").
The left-winger takes to political correctness as just another way to earn straight A's. This could not be more true, in my experience.
The section in which the narrator starts covertly writing pornography is the second-funniest thing I've ever read--and The Liar isn't really a fair comparison, since that book is pretty much a direct infusion from Thalia's evil twin.
WSWIF is out of print, but you can get it in The Florence King Reader.
Best stuff: The humor flows naturally from the characters (especially Gloria, the drugged-up medievalist with an Edward II fixation and a witchy curling iron). You never feel like King is yanking the plot or the characters around in order to make a point.
The right-winger is a slutty, cynical lush who coos to her pets ("Him have new name-names!").
The left-winger takes to political correctness as just another way to earn straight A's. This could not be more true, in my experience.
The section in which the narrator starts covertly writing pornography is the second-funniest thing I've ever read--and The Liar isn't really a fair comparison, since that book is pretty much a direct infusion from Thalia's evil twin.
WSWIF is out of print, but you can get it in The Florence King Reader.
KILLER SPIRALS OF THE SILVER SCREEN: Bruce Baugh writes, "There's a 2000 film adaptation [of Uzumaki], it turns out. Live action, first-time film by a director who'd been working in videos, and it's got a feel somewhere between Ridley Scott and David Cronenberg. It's gorgeous. The ending is, um, totally cryptic, but very evocative, and the story is mostly from the first volume, you'll be glad to know. :) Well worth seeing if you get the chance."
WHERE TO GET A POPE INNOCENT III ACTION FIGURE IN D.C.: My readers are so resourceful! Patrick Rothwell writes, "You can get your very own Innocent III action figure at Olsson's Bookstore on 19th Street just south of Dupont Circle. I almost bought one. Hope they are still there. He would make an interesting addition to those Star Wars action figures that were so popular when I was a kid. I wonder how he would fare against Darth Vader in a light saber battle."
Susie then removed her mask and caused a mighty stir;
The angry blog responded, taking turns at watching her...
Krubner has a horde of interesting posts on marriage up right about now.
Oxblog: Translate the Federalist Papers into Arabic. Yes.
The Head Volokh: Why I don't have comments.
Hitchcock's fetishes--photo essays on houses, staircases, women's hair, hands, eyes, and more. This looks like fascinating stuff, though I haven't had time to do more than glance at it yet. Via Relapsed Catholic.
And speaking of, here's a neat thing about the "voyeuristic" quality of Gilbert Hernandez's Palomar stories, from A.K. of the hilarious "Title Bout." His take on Palomar starts here. Via Alan David Doane.
The angry blog responded, taking turns at watching her...
Krubner has a horde of interesting posts on marriage up right about now.
Oxblog: Translate the Federalist Papers into Arabic. Yes.
The Head Volokh: Why I don't have comments.
Hitchcock's fetishes--photo essays on houses, staircases, women's hair, hands, eyes, and more. This looks like fascinating stuff, though I haven't had time to do more than glance at it yet. Via Relapsed Catholic.
And speaking of, here's a neat thing about the "voyeuristic" quality of Gilbert Hernandez's Palomar stories, from A.K. of the hilarious "Title Bout." His take on Palomar starts here. Via Alan David Doane.
"For all her insecurities, [Sylvia] Plath was the kind of American woman who gets a lock on femininity by saying, in effect: 'Listen, buster, I'm giving you five minutes to dominate me, and if I'm not dominated by then, you're toast.'"
--Florence King, book review in The Florence King Reader; not sure whether this is accurate as to Plath, but oh how I recognize the type of woman King's describing!
--Florence King, book review in The Florence King Reader; not sure whether this is accurate as to Plath, but oh how I recognize the type of woman King's describing!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)